Barney's Blog

Blog archive

Doug's Mailbag: Wyse Thin Clients

A reader breaks down his thoughts on Wyse hardware and its recent move to Dell:

As you described, we have essentially come full circle in the world of computing. From dumb terminal green screens connected, to mainframes, to stand-alone PCs, to networked PCs, to server-based networks and now back to terminals connected to thin client or cloud computing environments.

I've been installing thin client computing environments based on Citrix and Terminal Services for over 10 years. It has been fun when my clients have come to me in the past few years and said, 'I read about this could thing in the paper and I think we really need to get one.' I then say, 'but you've been running your own private cloud for six years -- we just didn't call it that then.' Thin client computing has served my clients well in terms of support and maintenance costs, and has served my business well in terms of being able to focus our resources on the management of servers and infrastructure rather than workstation support and management.

Up until very recently we've deployed HP thin client terminals based on Windows CE. While they were functional and efficient, there were several drawbacks that made them less than ideal. Over the past few months we've moved to WYSE Thin Client terminals, specifically the R10L, which has allowed us to provide a more robust computing environment to the end user and to centrally manage the configuration of the terminals without the need to make any configuration changes locally. This literally allows us to send brand-new WYSE terminals directly to a client location from the distributor and have an end user plug it into power and a network cable. As the unit powers up for the first time it downloads its configuration file and fully configures itself for the environment.

The support we've gotten from WYSE has been extremely good and I'm hopeful that Dell will leave well enough alone rather than trying to integrate the WYSE organization too tightly into Dell's organization. Being a Dell reseller as well, and using its server hardware for the heart of many of these thin client environments, I have respect for what it has done, but I do have my concerns that its recent acquisitions (Sonicwall, WYSE, etc.) will cause Dell to try to spread itself too thin. It seems to me that it's bringing together high-quality companies with well-respected products. I'm hopeful that Dell will allow the management of these organizations to continue to do what they have done well enough to make them an attractive takeover target to begin with.
-David

Share your thoughts with the editors of this newsletter! Write to dbarney@redmondmag.com. Letters printed in this newsletter may be edited for length and clarity, and will be credited by first name only (we do NOT print last names or e-mail addresses).

Posted by Doug Barney on 04/09/2012 at 1:19 PM


Featured

  • Gears

    Top 10 Microsoft Tips and Analyses of 2018

    Here are the year's most popular explainers and how-to columns -- along with some plain, old "Why did Microsoft do that?" musings thrown in.

  • Sign

    2018 Microsoft Predictions Revisited

    From guessing the fate of Windows 10 S to predicting Microsoft's next big move with Linux, Brien's predictions from a year ago were on the mark more than they weren't.

  • Microsoft Recaps Delivery Optimization Bandwidth Controls for Organizations

    Microsoft expects organizations using its Delivery Optimization peer-to-peer update scheme will optimally see 60 percent to 70 percent improvements in terms of network bandwidth use.

  • Getting a Handle on Hyper-V Virtual NICs

    Hyper-V usually makes it easy to configure virtual network adapters within VMs. That is, until you need to create a VM containing multiple virtual NICs.

comments powered by Disqus
Most   Popular

Office 365 Watch

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.