Windows 7 Meets PC Makers
With the Professional Developers Conference (PDC) barely over, Microsoft conference
organizers have already moved onto WinHEC, the Windows Hardware Engineering
Conference. PDC was all about Windows 7. Guess what? So
Most know that one of Vista's biggest bugaboos is hardware incompatibility.
It's no surprise, then, that hardware compatibility was Topic No. 1 at WinHEC,
where Windows execs touted a new approach to integrating and loading all those
Most also know that one of Vista's biggest bugaboos is performance -- at least,
the lack thereof on lower-end hardware. For Windows 7, Microsoft is using parallel
techniques to speed hardware and is changing the way applications load. Instead
of loading and remaining in memory, applications will be loaded just when needed.
Finally, most know that one of Vista's biggest bugaboos is the eternity it
can take to shut down the machine. Windows 7 should be orders of magnitude faster
to turn off -- in part, I'd guess, because fewer items remain active in memory.
Will Windows 7 compete more with Vista or XP? And does XP SP2 satisfy your
computing needs? Send me your thoughts at [email protected].
Adobe Patches the Stack
Adobe Reader is about as ubiquitous to PC users as milk is to babies.That's
why the Adobe Reader's stack overflow flaw is so troubling and installing Adobe's
new patch so important.
Without the patch, hackers can build a malicious PDF -- and once one is built,
these creeps will pass it around like a bottle of Ripple in a hobo camp. This
one bad PDF, then, could let hackers control literally millions of PCs.
Another smart move? Updating your Reader, as the flaw only affects older versions.
Google Repairs Android
Google's Android OS may be small (small enough to drive the new Google phone)
but it has plenty of code it seems for hackers to attack. Case in point: Last
week, researchers showed how hackers can take over the phone by tricking the
user into going to a malicious Web page. With that control, your passwords could
be stolen, no matter how many obscure letters and characters they contain.
The patch is now
out and requires a simple restart.
Opening OpenOffice.org 3
I've been corresponding with a handful of Redmond Report readers about OpenOffice.org
3. I'm doing an article about this software and would love to talk to as many
users as possible. Shoot me a note at [email protected]
and I'll shoot you back a bunch of detailed questions. Don't be shy now!
Mailbag: Your Thoughts on Cloud Computing
Last week, after Microsoft announced plans to offer a stripped-down version of
Office to run
in the cloud, Doug asked readers what it would take for them to put their
files on the Web. Here's what you said:
A frontal lobotomy and a bottle in front of me.
In your article, you ask what it would take for a reader to put their
files in a cloud somewhere. My answer is: NOTHING. I wouldn't do it. I know
we're breeding a whole new generation that believes having your apps and files
in a cloud is supposed to be more appealing and secure than traditional methods,
but for me, I don't want my files to be the responsibility of anyone but myself.
If my Internet connection is down and I need to work, where are my files?
If the Web site where they are stored gets taken down or fails, where are
my files? If I have to access the Internet over dial-up, are my files really
accessible? If someone hacks the site hosting my files, are they still there,
and if so, are they all over the world, as well?
No thank you! I will keep my files safe, secure and backed up at my home
office and continue to use offline files when I travel. It's worked for me
for years, and with nine copies and regular tape backups (moved offsite every
week), I'll continue to have my files to work with when I need them and without
all the worries. For individuals who are comfortable with the possibility
of having their files unavailable, maybe it's a good thing. For myself, I
can't imagine giving my file storage and safety away. It's almost like asking
your best friend to mind your checkbook for you and make sure all your bills
are paid, too. I may trust them, but never that far.
I can't see myself using such capabilities in the near future. I have
100GB of information and backups that I manage securely between my three personal
computers. Growth rate is 1 to 1.5GB per month. Remote access has not been
an issue thus far as a flash drive and a laptop have proved sufficient for
data I need to access away from home.
I think cloud computing and Internet banking have some similarities. Why
do I manage my money over the Web? I have a written contract with the bank.
I can see my bank balance and my transactions at any time. I have access to
history. I know that I can withdraw my money whenever I need it. (The analogy
breaks down a bit here.) And I'm working with a firm that I can trust.
I'd want all of these things before storing my data in the cloud. I'd
also want to be able to 'back up' my files onto my personal computer whenever
And Floyd responds to another
reader's thoughts about Azure -- specifically, that people with dial-up
wouldn't be able to access the cloud OS:
Recently, Mike said that "dial-up...with today's large data transfer
requirements, is quite useless." I think Mike misses an opportunity for
dial up users in that Azure could be the perfect solution to these folks.
Why? Well, just like with the remote terminals we use here, the only bandwidth
that's needed is for updating those parts of the screen that change as the
user moves the mouse, opens a window, closes a window and so on. Since the
data is stored and worked on remotely, there would only be a couple of instances
where a large download of data would be required -- say, when printing a document
to a local printer or when saving a file to a local drive.
If Azure can provide me with cloud encryption for my files that I can
control, I say, "Bring it on!"
Tell us what you think! Leave a comment below or send an e-mail to [email protected].
Doug Barney is editor in chief of Redmond magazine and the VP, editorial director of Redmond Media Group.