Google's SaaS Scare
Nobody's perfect, right? Not even Google, which has suffered some well-publicized
recently and finally felt compelled
for at least one of them.
Hey, Google, love means never having to say you're sorry. And we still love
you -- don't we? After all, you're the revolution, the flag bearer for Software-as-a-Service,
the company that's going to have us using nothing but free-ish applications
in our browser before too long and chucking that clunky old Microsoft software
in the same bin where Corel WordPerfect now resides. Right?
Well, maybe not. It might not be a big deal to most of us -- and your editor
does have a personal Gmail account -- that Gmail went down for a couple of
hours on a weekday afternoon, but it was probably a pretty big deal for people
who are trying to run their businesses on Gmail and Google Apps.
Beyond that, and more to the point for the channel and users alike, the mighty
Google's stumble was an unpleasant reminder that SaaS as a model still isn't
as ready for prime time as many folks would like it to be...despite all
the SaaS hype that some media organizations (including this one) have spread
OK, so Gmail going out for a couple hours isn't the end of the world for most
companies, although e-mail outages can be a major problem. But what about enterprise
applications? What happens when CRM goes kaput for a couple of hours on a Monday?
What about -- heaven forbid -- ERP applications?
It's no wonder that hosted ERP is the last
frontier for the SaaS model. Really, really critical stuff -- like the software
that runs companies -- just can't be subject to significant downtime. Oh, sure,
on-premises stuff has its problems -- huge, costly problems in some cases --
but at least companies have staff members or helpful Microsoft partners who
can take care of issues in-house. When somebody else's datacenter goes down,
what do you do? Sit and wait for somebody far away to fix it.
The real crux of this story is that we're talking about Google here. If Google,
which is betting much of its business model on SaaS and pouring millions of
dollars into datacenters, can suffer fairly nerve-jangling outages, what about
smaller hosting companies with fewer datacenters? What about other vendors that
don't specialize in hosting but are just dipping their toes into the SaaS waters
(we're looking at you, Microsoft)? This sort of thing doesn't do much for users'
Partners need to have some sort of SaaS story for their customers. But they
also need to know how to answer the inevitable questions about the model's Achilles
heel. And they need those answers to be specific and meaningful, not just empty
guarantees or platitudes about point-nines of uptime. It's one thing for customers
to rationally know that SaaS comes with the risk of downtime; it's quite another
for them to actually experience an outage.
It's something to think about now that the leader of the SaaS revolution has
racked up a little bad publicity for itself and the model and turned a little
bit of SaaS love into apprehension. After all, nobody's perfect -- but it's
dealing with imperfection that makes some companies great and causes others
to fizzle. Google is big enough and experienced enough to be great in the long-run.
Not everybody else, though, will end up in that category.
What's your take on SaaS and the risk of downtime? Do incidents like the Gmail
outage make you think twice about moving key enterprise apps to a hosted model?
Have your say at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Posted by Lee Pender on 08/14/2008 at 1:22 PM