Federal Agencies Lag in Security Preparedness

When it comes to ensuring compliance with information security rules or best practices, a substantial minority of federal agencies still aren't making the cut.

That's the conclusion of the "Seventh Report Card on Computer Security at Federal Departments and Agencies," the latest edition of an annual report prepared by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

The 2007 agency "report card" gives nine out of 24 federal agencies -- including, crucially, the Department of Defense, the Department of the Treasury, the Department of the Interior, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission -- failing grades for their abilities to secure data.

Federal agencies as a whole received a "C" (up from a "C-" in 2006).

Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.) takes a glum view of the report's findings. "We need to do more to bring consistency to the [information governance] community regarding standards and review," Davis said in a prepared release. "We need to seriously consider incentives for agency success and funding penalties and personnel reforms for agencies that don't measure up. We need a bill with teeth, and we need agencies to understand the goal is to keep information safe, not to check a statutory box."

The report assesses federal agencies on the basis of annual information security testing; security plans of action, milestones or corrective-action measures; whether their systems are certified and accredited as "secure"; security configuration management; their ability to detect and quickly react to security breaches; the existence and effectiveness of their security training programs; and the overall accuracy of their inventories.

Only two departments -- the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) -- received "A+" grades in both 2006 and 2007. Both the Department of Justice and the Environmental Protection Agency slipped from "A+" grades in 2006 to a more sobering "A-." The Social Security Administration received "A" grades in both 2006 and 2007, while three departments -- Housing and Urban Development, the Office of Personnel Management and the General Services Administration -- improved their 2006 showings to achieve "A" or better grades in 2007.

In addition to traditional metrics, the newest agency report card takes several additional factors into account, including each agency's financial statements for fiscal year 2007. It's for this reason that USAID, the NSF and the Social Security Administration (SSA) were all commended for what the report's authors call their "sterling" financials. Similarly, both HUD and the DOJ received low-confidence "A"s because of their "weaker" financial results.

Interestingly, a number of agencies (including the Department of Energy, the Department of Homeland Security, NASA and the Department of Education) slipped drastically, notching "D" or lower grades.

About the Author

Stephen Swoyer is a Nashville, TN-based freelance journalist who writes about technology.


  • Microsoft and SAP Enhance Partnership with Teams Integration

    Microsoft and SAP this week described continuing partnership efforts on Microsoft Azure, while also planning a Microsoft Teams integration with SAP's enterprise resource planning product and other solutions.

  • Blue Squares Graphic

    Microsoft Previews Azure IoT Edge for Linux on Windows

    Microsoft announced a preview of Azure IoT Edge for Linux on Windows, which lets organizations tap Linux virtual machine processes that also work with Windows- and Azure-based processes and services.

  • How To Automate Tasks in Azure SQL Database

    Knowing how to automate tasks in the cloud will make you a more productive DBA. Here are the key concepts to understand about cloud scripting and a rundown of the best tools for automating code in Azure.

  • Microsoft Open License To End Next Year for Government and Education Groups

    Microsoft's "Open License program" will end on Jan. 1, 2022, and not just for commercial customers, but also for government, education and nonprofit organizations.

comments powered by Disqus