Supercomputers Still Push the Envelope
Both Sun and IBM presented at a high-performance computing conference in Dresden,
Germany this week, showing they still have serious stake in the ethereal and
ultra-fast world of supercomputing. Laptops they are not, but these supercomputers
have more power than you could ever possibly need.
Andreas Bechtolsheim, the brilliant billionaire co-founder of Sun Microsystems,
has developed a new
supercomputer called the Constellation System, which is made up of more
than 13,000 networked microprocessors. The Constellation is expected to perform
at speeds of 500 teraflops. It's being installed at the Texas Advanced Computing
Center, located in Austin, Texas, and should be ready by October.
The primary challenge in developing a monster system like this, says Bechtolsheim,
was getting the individual processors to share information quickly enough to
solve the most complex computational problems. Modifying the data switches was
his answer -- that and 18-hour workdays and collaborators spread across the
Not to be outdone, IBM flexed its supercomputing muscle at the Dresden conference,
presenting its petaflop-level
supercomputer called the Blue Gene/P. The Blue Gene/P will run at a staggering
3 quadrillion operations per second -- or 3 petaflops. The U.S. Department of
Energy will be the first Blue Gene/P customer later this year. Others, mostly
European government agencies, will follow shortly thereafter.
These are some absolutely mind-boggling computational capabilities. Do you
have any supercomputer experience? How do you think wildly cutting-edge technology
like this filters down to the real world? Let me know at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Big Blue Shells Out Big Green
In other Big Blue news, IBM just reached
a $7 million settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding
its alleged underreporting of stock performance. The questionable stock reports
date back to 2000 in relation to IBM's retail services division that sells point-of-sale
In arriving at the settlement, IBM neither confirmed nor denied any sketchy
behavior (and PR people have plenty of experience neither confirming nor denying).
It also promised not to violate SEC provisions in the future.
Once IBM sells a Blue Gene/P or two, that fine will seem like a drop in the
What's your take on the feds slapping Big Blue, Microsoft or any of the other
tech giants with fines? Do you think it will make them follow all the rules
and be good corporate citizens, or is it just a slap on the wrist? File your
thoughts at email@example.com.
Google Gives Up the World
Well, not really, but the next best thing. Google yesterday announced a new
program called Google Earth Outreach, wherein it will make its wildly popular
Google Earth mapping software easily accessible to nonprofit organizations.
Several of the program's first member organizations, like Earthwatch and Fair
Trade Certified, are already dialed in and looking down at the Earth. Groups
like that use Google Earth's detailed global mapping tools for environmental
and humanitarian purposes, like tracking refugee movement or the effects of
"The technologies we're developing can be an important catalyst for education,
sharing information, advocacy and to address global and local issues that affect
everyone around the world," said Elliot Schrage, vice president of global
communications for Google.
The popularity and myriad uses of the Google Earth technology has surprised
even the Googlers themselves. "We didn't see the majority of uses for Google
Earth," said John Hanke, director of the Google's Earth and Maps department.
"It's blown away everybody on the team."
Interested nonprofits can apply directly to the Google Outreach Program for
grants to use Google Earth and receive ongoing tech support.
Have you ever used Google Earth? What do you think of this unprecedented view
of the world? Besides the fact that it's really cool, do you feel -- as some
do -- that it should be restricted to prevent inappropriate or illegal use (as
GPS technology was when it first came out)? Find me at my office outside of
Boston at firstname.lastname@example.org. If you
see a Subaru with a kayak on the roof in the parking lot, you'll know I'm there.
Mailbag: A Non-MS OS?, More on Microsoft-Google Search
after news that the Longhorn Reloaded project has been shut down, Peter asked
readers if they'd rather have an independent Windows OS. Here are some of your
Would I like having an independent version of a Windows operating system?
What a concept. We already have five flavors...kind of like Linux.
Yes, I want that!
I most assuredly would like that.
I really would like to see this piece of software and learn more about
I think the idea of a non-MS Windows OS is cute and everything, but it
would be a HUGE NIGHTMARE for all involved. One has to look at the entire
universe of issues before declaring this a quite grand thing to do.
I would like to have my computer boot to a menu of applications. Depending
on the software application, when I click the app, it would load in a virtual
window under the native operating system that optimizes its performance. So
in one virtual window, I would have Outlook running under XP, Firefox under
Mint Linux, Stellarian in BSD, Safari under Mac/OS, etc. When I insert a CD
to install the software, it would know the operating system to install it
under or I could choose.
Probably would be a nightmare to create but it intrigues me. Kind of a quadruple
boot loader but a menu of applications on the front end. Sounds crazy, I know!
Michael chimes in with his 2 cents about the Microsoft-Google
fight over Vista's default search:
I do not agree with Google saying that it's hard to configure or change
the default -- at least from a technician's standpoint. I do agree with the
fact that the typical end user is not going to take the time to change the
default settings in IE7. However, folks that use Google -- and I have seen
this happen here at the university -- will install Google desktop or the toolbar
not knowing about the search features built into IE7. I had to send an e-mail
out explaining this more than once.
I think Google should pick a different issue to go after M$ -- like why
does spellcheck not see "Google" as a word and try to change it
to "Goggle." This has to be Redmond conspiracy.
Meanwhile, readers volunteered their own desktop search strategies:
My strategy: If you put files/documents where they belong, you won't
lose them, so you won't have to search for them. Yes, I do use search in e-mail,
but desktop -- no.
At work, we are not allowed to install anything, so we get what is in
the OS. Since that OS currently is XP, that means zip. Well, the Explorer
search, for whatever good that does. At home, however, I use the FREE, ultra-fast
and very simple to use FindAndRunRobot developed by Mouser at DonationCoder.com.
A simple ctrl+space brings up the search window and I type in the word for
what I am looking for. It is almost always the top choice before I write half
the word. It also will allow plug-ins to extend its functionality in its next
release which is due out very soon. Best of all, it doesn't suffer from all
this bickering that could be better used making the software better instead.
And finally, count Steve as someone who won't be lining
up for an iPhone this week:
As soon as the iPhone deploys Windows Mobile 6, we will be purchasing
over 400 of them. Until then, forget it!
Got something to add? Let us have it! Leave a comment below or send an e-mail