News

Microsoft, Bristol Settle Lawsuit

It’s not the big one, but Microsoft has at least managed to settle one of the lawsuits hanging over its head.

Microsoft Corp. and Danbury, Conn.-based Bristol Technology announced Wednesday that they have ended the legal wrangling that began in August 1998, when Bristol filed an antitrust suit against Redmond and claimed violations of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUPTA). The trial was held in June-July 1999.

Terms of the settlement were not disclosed, but last year, a judge ordered Microsoft to pay Bristol nearly $5 million, including $1 million in punitive damages, and $3.7 million in legal fees, for its violations.

Bristol’s primary complaint against Microsoft was that Redmond had licensed some of the Windows source code to Bristol in the early 90s, then reneged on the deal. “After initially approaching Bristol in 1991 and creating a dependency for Bristol and its customers on the Windows programming interfaces, Microsoft is now seeking to end access to this technology on all but Windows operating systems. Microsoft is doing so by refusing to provide Bristol with current and future Windows source code, and offering only a license that Microsoft knows is oppressive, unworkable and unreasonable,” Bristol said in a release at the time it filed the suit in 1998.

A jury partially agreed, dismissing the antitrust claims against Microsoft, but did find in favor of Bristol on one claim under CUPTA.

Ironically, Bristol says it has a better relationship with Microsoft now than it had prior to the lawsuit. “We continue to partner with Microsoft,” says Jean Blackwell, vice president of sales for Bristol. “We license [Windows] source code and include it in our products, and we continue to do business with each other when it benefits both companies.”

“As a company, Bristol is much stronger as a result of the lawsuit than when we started. The best outcome in the end was the settlement,” Blackwell says.

Bristol makes products that allow developers to work across platforms. For instance, its Wind/U product allows developers to port Windows applications to Unix. Other platforms include Compaq’s OpenVMS, Linux, and IBM’s OS/390. Since the latest version of Wind/U, released last October, does include Windows 2000 source code, the companies may have been close to a resolution then.

Microsoft was not available to comment, but a press release on its Web site states that it is happy to have the litigation in the past, and claims it did nothing wrong. – Keith Ward

About the Author

Scott Bekker is editor in chief of Redmond Channel Partner magazine.

Featured

  • What Money in Excel Means for the Future of Microsoft 365 Apps

    Microsoft's new personal finance tool hints at what's in store for next-generation Office applications, from more third-party integrations to subscription requirements.

  • Microsoft Buys Orions Systems To Enhance Vision AI Capabilities in Dynamics 365

    Microsoft announced on Tuesday that it has acquired Orions Systems with the aim of enhancing Dynamics 365 capabilities, as well as the Microsoft Power Platform.

  • Microsoft Hires Movial To Build Android OS for Microsoft Devices

    Microsoft has hired the Romanian operations of software engineering and design services company Movial to develop an Android-based operating system solution for the Microsoft Devices business segment.

  • Microsoft Ending Workflows for SharePoint 2010 Online Next Month

    Microsoft on Monday gave notice that it will be ending support this year for the "workflows" component of SharePoint 2010 Online, as well as deprecating that component for SharePoint 2013 Online.

comments powered by Disqus

Office 365 Watch

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.