ZTE Inks Android IP Deal With Microsoft

ZTE signed an intellectual property agreement with Microsoft that's associated with Linux-based operating systems fostered by Google.

The China-based equipment maker ZTE is licensing some of Microsoft's patents to cover intellectual property used in ZTE's "phones, tablets, computers and other devices running Android and Chrome OS," according to Microsoft's announcement, which was attributed to Horacio Gutierrez, Microsoft's corporate vice president and deputy general counsel for legal and corporate affairs.

ZTE is a maker of telecom and networking equipment plus mobile devices that reported $13.6 billion (CNY 84.2 billion) in revenue in 2012. Microsoft's announcement of the ZTE deal comes shortly after it announced a similar one with Taiwan-based Hon Hai, the parent company of device-maker Foxconn Ltd.

With those deals in place, Gutierrez now claims that Microsoft's has established intellectual property agreements with the device manufacturers responsible for 80 percent of the Android-based smartphones sold in the U.S. market, as well as "a majority of those sold worldwide." While that seems rather one-sided, he suggested that intellectual property licensing is a "two-way street" at Microsoft. For instance, he said that Microsoft paid more than $4 billion over the last 10 years to license the intellectual properties of other entities.

That $4 billion amount doesn't seem so great given just one estimate that Microsoft may have pulled in nearly $800 million in one quarter from HTC and Samsung royalty payments. It's thought that Microsoft may make more money from intellectual property licensing associated with Android than it does from Windows Phone royalties. Windows phone badly trails Android in terms of the number of users. Microsoft's mobile OS has about 3.2 percent of the market, according to recent comScore measurements.

Gutierrez suggested that device manufacturers could avoid the "smartphone patent wars" by simply licensing Microsoft's intellectual property. Most have done so, although Google's Motorola Mobility arm has offered some legal resistance in the courts.

The details of these royalty payments to Microsoft have typically not been available to the public. There was no disclosure of what ZTE agreed to pay.

Microsoft isn't quite done with the licensing holdouts yet.

"We have worked for multiple years to reach an amicable solution with the few global companies who have yet to take a license, but so far they have been unwilling to address these issues in a fair manner," Gutierrez stated. "We'd prefer to consider these companies licensing partners and remain hopeful they can join the rest of the industry in the near future."

Recently, Microsoft set up a Web portal and tool to disclose its intellectual property holdings. However, Microsoft had initiated these smartphone platform wars initially by not being transparent at all. Gutierrez had claimed six years ago that Linux violated 235 of Microsoft's patents, but he never publicly identified the patents that were infringed. Google, which gave away the Android OS royalty free to device makers, never provided indemnity to those using it.

About the Author

Kurt Mackie is senior news producer for 1105 Media's Converge360 group.


  • Microsoft Starting To Roll Out New Excel Connected Data Types

    Microsoft on Thursday announced some Excel and Power BI enhancements that add "connected data types" on top of the standard strings and numbers options.

  • Windows 10 Users Getting New Process for Finding Optional Driver Updates

    Accessing Windows 10 drivers classified as "optional updates" will be more of a manual seek-and-install type of experience, starting on Nov. 5, 2020, Microsoft explained in a Wednesday announcement.

  • Microsoft Changes Privacy Platform Name to SmartNoise

    Microsoft Research has changed the name of its "differential privacy" platform from "WhiteNoise" to "SmartNoise," according to a Wednesday announcement.

  • Why Restarting a Failed SCVMM Job Might Be a Bad Idea

    Occasionally, restarting a failed System Center Virtual Machine Manager job can leave your virtualization infrastructure in an unknown state. Here's how to avoid that.

comments powered by Disqus