All's Well that Ends Well
The pitfalls of early adoption. Plus, logging in can be a lot easier said than done.
We pride ourselves on being early adopters, so on Jan. 31, 2007 -- the day
after the official launch of Windows Vista -- we activated our volume license
for Vista Ultimate along with Windows Live One Care.
We proceeded put it on our desktops and servers in hopes of a seamless upgrade
from XP. We quickly discovered, however, that Windows Vista Firewall and Windows
Live One Care Firewall conflicted with one another. We discovered another problem
when we found Windows Defender wouldn't work well together with Windows Live
Cry for Help
We made the 911 call to Microsoft, and the company's tech support call center
in India was great. Amey (our tech support person) was reassuring, saying "not
to worry." Using Windows Easy Assist, he proceeded to uninstall Windows
Defender from Windows Vista.
was one problem with this: He didn't realize that Windows Defender is an integral
part of Windows Vista, unlike in Windows XP where it's a separate program. Since
he carried out the uninstall at the server level, everything crashed and no
one knew why. In the process we also discovered that our Dell computers wouldn't
allow the Windows Vista Ultimate Installation disks to boot up from the disks,
so we were up a certain creek -- the one that can't be mentioned in a family
publication -- without a paddle. Luckily, our data was backed up, but we had
to reformat our hard drives and do fresh installs of everything. And I mean
of every program we ever had.
Well, this eventually turned out to be a good thing because in the process we
eliminated all instances where drivers were not available yet for Windows Vista.
The only bad news in all this was being told by Dell that the drivers for all
of our Dell 922 printers wouldn't be available until April. Consequently, we
had to purchase 86 HP inkjets (which delighted HP).
The somewhat unexpected -- though happy -- ending is that the Windows Vista
Reliability Monitor says we are now at an 8.4 rating, which is much better than
we ever could've expected had it not been for our four days of madness.
Since all's well that ends well, we still love Microsoft.
When Less Protocol Is a Good Thing
By Alex Albright
Several years ago the network team was doing some work over the weekend and
I happened to be there at the time. When they finished, I noticed that my log-on
was unexpectedly slow. This should not have been the case given there were so
few people there. I notified my manager, but nothing was done.
Your Worst IT Nightmare?
Send us your
300-600 word story -- if we print it, you'll win $100 and
a Redmond T-shirt! E-mail your story to Editor Ed Scannell
at [email protected]
and use "Never Again" as the subject line.
The next day, when everyone was at work, the log-on time was beyond abysmal.
You could log-on after half an hour -- if you could log-on at all -- but forget
about doing anything else. There were about 2,500 people whose productivity
came to a standstill. Three days later the problem was resolved and everything
was back up and running. That was the good news. The bad news was to fix it
we had to pay $250,000 for new switches -- actually a small price to pay since
we were getting dinged $800,000 for every day that we had a total outage.
The problem? Many of the machines had dual protocols, both Pathworks as well
as TCP/IP. Consequently, the switches had to register each Network Interface
Card twice, and so ran out of memory. Ouch.
Steven Fishman is the CIO of Ultrasonic Precisions Inc. in Corona, Calif. Alex Albright is a server administrator in Barker, Texas.