Forrester's Split Personality

A week or two ago, Forrester Research raised a stink with a report saying that enterprise uptake of Vista was more anemic than a German POW. Microsoft spat back that other Forrester analysts have a more upbeat view of Vista. Funny thing was, a Microsoft exec blogged about the company's misgivings and got hammered in comments More

Posted by Doug Barney on 08/27/20080 comments


More Good News on IT Spending

At the risk of sounding like a broken record (or a skipping CD), there's good news about IT spending. I've written about several reports pointing to higher IT budgets. Research powerhouse Gartner is weighing in, reporting that overall spending is up around 8 percent .

What are you spending money on? Security? Services? New apps? Or just keeping things running? Details may be sent to More

Posted by Doug Barney on 08/27/20080 comments


Mac Servers Driving Windows -- Really?

A recent report from the Yankee Group about virtualization has some reasonable findings, such as the fact that 75 percent of companies plan to use virtual wares in their datacenters, and that 40 percent of current virtualization customers mix and match technologies from different vendors. That all makes perfect sense.

Here's the shocker: Some 23 percent of enterprises use Mac servers to drive virtual Vista and XP desktops. That is so unbelievable, I actually don't believe it!

More

Posted by Doug Barney on 08/26/20080 comments


RFID Fights Kidnappers

Kidnappers in Mexico might soon find the federales breaking down their door. It seems that more and more affluent Mexicans are taking drastic steps to be recovered in the event of a kidnapping -- like having transmitter chips planted in their bodies . If they go missing, a satellite can pinpoint the location.

Posted by Doug Barney on 08/26/20080 comments


Mailbag: Vista Antidotes

Readers share their methods for dodging Vista:

As long as I was being forced to buy a new system to upgrade the OS, I went and bought a iMac. Parallels gets me the few XP Windows apps I need to use; for the rest I use Mac-based programs. Love the new Mac. It's a lot easier to use and maintain than Windows. For supporting Mac users, iChat is great and the built-in mike is live during screen-sharing sessions so we can hang up the phone. XP is still in use in the corporate environs I haunt, no change expected there.
-Eddie

For any of you who want to see what is involved in removing Vista, see this thread at CR4.
-Ari

More

Posted by Doug Barney on 08/26/20080 comments


Apple Moving to Redmond?

Last time I checked, Apple was still based in Cupertino. But one blogger thinks the company could just as easily be headquartered a bit farther north, in Redmond, Wash.

How's that? No, it's not the monopoly it enjoys (as one Redmond Report reader recently pointed out, nearly 100 percent of Macintosh computers run an Apple operating system). Instead, Victor Godinez points to flaky, new operating systems such as the one driving the latest iPhone, and bundling software such as tying Safari to iTunes.

More

Posted by Doug Barney on 08/21/20080 comments


What's the Deal with Vista?

I can imagine Jerry Seinfeld doing a pretty good stand-up routine about Vista. What's the deal with Vista? Vista users don't care what runs on their computers -- they care what doesn't. And what's up with Bill Gates? This guy is so rich, he can afford a Vista machine that doesn't crash. It's called a MacBook.

But nooo. Instead of poking fun, old Jerr is getting $10 million to convince us all that Vista is cool as part of a $300 million advertising campaign.

More

Posted by Doug Barney on 08/21/20080 comments


Mailbag: On the Hunt for XP

Now that most of you have thrown up your hands at Vista, Doug asked what you're doing to get XP. Here's what some of you had to say:

Here's a vote for staying with XP. We are finding it easier to buy XP now than a year ago. Dell and HP have seen the light, for example, and make is easy, but ONLY if you go through their business portals. We have found, and many IT people agree, that if we are forced to, we will save and reuse licenses we have already purchased when systems go out of service. OEM agreements be damned. Call it a piece-by-piece upgrade if you want to split hairs about OEM license restrictions.

The effort to wipe a Vista system and install XP is nothing compared to the headache of supporting it. It isn't about being new, misunderstood or not giving it a chance. It is fundamentally flawed. What we see on the consumer side is that people will buy Vista for personal systems and then fight with it for months and then give up, seeking out people like us to fix it by installing XP. Bad press had nothing to do with it. Sooner or later Microsoft will realize that by not selling XP, Vista is not competing with XP -- it is competing with the XP license I already have.
-Derek

Sticking with Windows XP certainly has some challenges. Often our effort to "downgrade" PCs, laptops and tablets to XP results in missing out on key features of the original load or compatibility issues. We've learned to provide proven XP laptop/desktop loads, but there are still some issues. We also stick with Lenovo for most of our needs, because they do provide XP as an option. I'm betting other vendors are also seeing improved sales by offering to pre-load Windows XP. For example, on some of their laptops even consumers can choose: "Genuine Windows Vista Business with Windows XP Professional Downgrade." Fully supported by their help desk and repair centers.
-Joe

Well, this month I had to buy a new laptop. I really tried to avoid Dell, because you have to pay an extra £60 for a downgrade. So I went to Lenovo, and they still have some Thinkpads with XP; they're not as cutting-edge as the "19-hour battery life" from Dell, but for school/work it's more than welcome!
-Anonymous

Vista is a no-go zone. Microsoft cannot assume the role of bully in this debate. First, it dumps an OS onto us that we did not have much say in developing. The good features of XP were removed and the bad features of Vista were marketed as if it was some sort of rock god. Vista is slow, no matter how Microsoft spins it. It has nothing over XP except more cost -- significant additional cost, at that. I don't care about eye candy or Aero; that's just fluff and nonsense and I am not paying for it.

I provide advice to Victorian government agencies and my advice has been: Do not, under any circumstances, get into Vista. So far they all agree with my view so I think Microsoft has more than just a major perception problem on its hand. We will not be held ransom by Microsoft executives thinking they can market or bully us into submission.
-Ken

More

Posted by Doug Barney on 08/21/20080 comments


Microsoft and VMware: Less Hate

VMware's new CEO Paul Maritz knows a thing or two about Microsoft. After all, he worked there for a decade-and-a-half and, last I checked, still lives in the Seattle area. Maritz, I believe, knows how to fight with Microsoft and how to get along when need be.

Recently, we saw an example of what could be a long-lasting détente: VMware joined Microsoft's virtualization validation program, meaning that Microsoft will qualify its applications to run well under ESX and thus gain the advantages of Microsoft's new licensing terms which allow you to move VMs from server to server with no extra licensing costs.

More

Posted by Doug Barney on 08/21/20080 comments


Virtual Licensing Shifts

Virtualization is supposed to make computing cheaper. But if you simply create VM after VM, your costs will rise faster than Michael Phelps' net worth. And if you move these VMs around, extra license fees will hit as vendors like Microsoft treat the moved VM as a brand-new install.

Microsoft is loosening up a bit . Before, an app had to be in place for three months before it could be moved for free. Now, 41 different apps can moved around from server to server for free. This isn't exactly a revolution, but will certainly support IT agility.

Posted by Doug Barney on 08/20/20080 comments


HP and Cisco Unify on Communications

When Microsoft entered the unified communications market, the folks at Cisco were far from pleased. In fact, I'd gather you could hear the curses from Cisco's San Jose headquarters all the way to Redmond.

Cisco wasn't going to take this laying down. Its most recent response is to partner with HP to jointly sell and market unified tools to IT.

The HP deal might also be designed to shore up some weaknesses in Cisco's unified lineup, particularly VoIP, the cornerstone of any unified solution. Service providers, the most demanding of VoIP customers, know and respect the Cisco brand, but Cisco is clearly More

Posted by Doug Barney on 08/20/20080 comments


Living with XP

Many of you...well, most of you...OK, nearly all of you are avoiding Vista and sticking with XP. But Microsoft ain't making it easy. Go to Circuit City and all you'll see is Vista, Vista, Vista. And Microsoft volume agreements are pushing the new OS over the old.

How are you dealing with XP? Buying new machines and downgrading? Just not using Vista licenses that come with your existing agreements? Tell us your story by writing to dbarney@redmondmag.com

Posted by Doug Barney on 08/20/20080 comments


Subscribe on YouTube