News

IE 9 Upgrades Can Save Millions, Study Asserts

Upgrading from Internet Explorer 8 to IE 9 can represent a cost benefit to organizations, according to a June Microsoft-commissioned study.

The study was produced for Microsoft by Forrester Research, which conducted company interviews in April 2011. To compile the data, Forrester talked with representatives from six unidentified organizations that upgraded from IE 8 to IE9 as part of Microsoft's Technology Adoption Program. The companies involved in the study were selected by Microsoft for review by Forrester.

The study's conclusion, based on a total economic impact analysis, was that moving to IE 9 represented a net present value (NPV) of $3.3 million over three years' time, with payback occurring after 15 months.

"The three-year risk-adjusted total NPV of $3,349,000 represents the net costs and benefits attributed to using Internet Explorer 9 versus Internet Explorer 8," the report explained.

The study's author postulated a 60,000-employee "composite organization," based on the six companies, to derive that cost estimate. This IE 9 upgrade effort occurred in conjunction with the PC refresh cycle as the composite organization transitioned from using Windows XP and Vista on PCs to using the Windows 7 operating system.

The time that it would take to deploy IE 9 was estimated by the organizations interviewed to be about 12 to 18 months. That estimate included time for "testing, application remediation, pilot, and distribution," according to the report. The composite organization took an estimated 2,020 hours for the labor associated with this IE 9 move.

Various tools were used to move to IE 9 by the six organizations interviewed. Those tools included the "Internet Explorer Compatibility Test Tool, Internet Explorer Administration Kit (IEAK), Configuration Manager, System Center Essentials 2010 (Essentials), [System] Center Configuration Manager (SCCM), Microsoft Deployment Toolkit 2010, Application Compatibility Toolkit, and Windows Server Update Services (WSUS)."

The prep work to catalog the apps and determine if remediation was needed turned out to be just a mental hurdle, according to the report.

"Interviewed customers reported that one of the biggest hurdles they had to overcome prior to making a decision to upgrade the browser was gaining an inventory of applications in their environment and determining the scope of application remediation," the report states. "Companies frequently saw this as a bigger problem than turned out to be the case."

The report cited a "historical" estimate that 80 percent of apps would not require remediation after a move to IE 9. However, based on the interviews, the experience was more positive that that rule of thumb, according to Forrester's report.

The top benefits of moving to IE 9, beyond the extended cost savings, were described by interviewees as "malware protection and improved security," as well as "some improvement in productivity for power browser users."

The study, "The Total Economic Impact Of Windows Internet Explorer 9," can be downloaded here (PDF) for free. Microsoft also offers a synopsis of the study at this blog.

One participant in Microsoft's Technology Adoption Program was Siemens. During its test phase, Siemens deployed IE 9 to "more than 2,100 global employees participating in a pilot deployment of Windows 7 Enterprise," Microsoft explained in another blog post. Siemens is now planning a broad rollout in the next year or two to all of its employees. The rollout will include a mixture of both Microsoft Office 2010 and Microsoft Office 2007, plus Windows 7 Enterprise.

About the Author

Kurt Mackie is online news editor for the 1105 Enterprise Computing Group.

comments powered by Disqus

Reader Comments:

Tue, Aug 2, 2011 ibsteve2u Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Wonder how many migrations are driven not by anything as formal as NPV or ROI studies, but instead by the accumulated weight of "Why do I have to use this old crap at work? It isn't what I use at home!" Particularly when a new CEO/CTO/CFO weighs in? There is some value in having the employees of your entity periodically take a quick multiple-choice "What O/S do you use at home?" survey. If you find that some significant percentage of your current employees have migrated ahead of you, then you can rest assured that you're losing money 1) training youthful new hires who most likely will have little if any experience with the older generation O/S you're still using and 2) when current employees begin to unconsciously apply new methods of accomplishing tasks that work at home to your entity...where they won't work. Of course if your O/S vendor is going to muddy the water with hints and public presentations of an entirely different desktop GUI on their next variant (say it is tiled, for instance) then you're stuck trying to figure out if it is still cost-effective to make a short-term intermediate jump into planned obsolescence - which would be questionable.

Add Your Comment Now:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Redmond Tech Watch

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.