News

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Microsoft's Patent Complaints

Microsoft got its day in court before eight U.S. Supreme Court justices on Monday, based on a long-running legal dispute with Canadian company i4i LLP.

Microsoft's oral arguments about evidential standards in patent cases were heard by all justices except John Roberts, who recused himself. Microsoft's arguments stem from the company's past court losses in an intellectual property case involving plaintiff i4i. The Toronto-based company sued Microsoft and was awarded more than $290 million in damages in August of 2009 for Microsoft's "willful infringement" of i4i's patent on custom XML technology.

The custom XML technology was found to have been used in older versions of Microsoft Word. Microsoft has since removed the technology in U.S. markets, but it hasn't paid the penalty awarded by an East Texas court.

Microsoft's Supreme Court appeal (PDF) could affect the penalties in the i4i case, perhaps leading to another trial to reconsider them. However, Microsoft's efforts before the Supreme Court go farther. The company's attorneys are arguing that the "clear and convincing evidence" requirement to disprove a patent is too high of a legal standard when the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office lacked "prior art" evidence disproving the patent. Microsoft wants the burden of proof to be lowered to "preponderance of evidence" when disproving a patent.

This position was described today in a Microsoft blog post by Brad Smith, Microsoft's senior vice president and general counsel, who was joined in that opinion by attorneys from Apple, Cisco and Facebook. Microsoft has amicus curiae support from a number of tech companies, plus the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

On the other side, i4i has 22 friend-of-the-court briefs filed, including one by the U.S. government. Government attorneys are backing i4i's position that the burden-of-proof standard in patent cases should not be changed.

Microsoft's blog post claims that i4i was selling its technology before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office considered it for a patent. Microsoft also claims that the evidence it needed in the i4i case was "discarded" by i4i, making it harder to disprove the patent.

i4i's Chairman Loudon Owen said that Microsoft's argument on the burden-of-proof standard in patent cases should be dismissed by the Supreme Court.

"In our view, Microsoft cannot overcome the prevailing law and sound policy of the clear-and-convincing standard based on its spin campaign that now seems to be focused on innuendo about i4i and an atrociously weak argument that weakening the patent system will encourage innovation," Owen said in a released statement. "We are confident we will continue to prevail."

Microsoft has taken its "patent reform" arguments to the U.S. Congress as well, and it has progressed halfway toward that end. Legislation backed by Microsoft called the "America Invents Act" passed in the U.S. Senate in March; it's currently awaiting consideration at the U.S. House of Representatives. One of the changes sought by Microsoft is to replace the current "first to invent" patent rule with a "first to file" approach.

About the Author

Kurt Mackie is online news editor for the 1105 Enterprise Computing Group.

comments powered by Disqus

Reader Comments:

Thu, Apr 21, 2011 Stanley G. US

Patents are suppose to protect the free flow of innovation to the market place. The inventor should be protected but, the issue has become clouded by coorperate battles over market posititon and the consumer is loosing benefit. Common sense innovation is being curbed by all these lawsuits. I am all for a good patent system not one clouded by murky nonsense. Perhaps we need a new look at new system which protects the vulnerable and let those less vulnerable duke it out in the marketplace. We've come a long way from creating a new stove which is clearly a big step to algorythms and computer code which are not so clear.

Mon, Apr 18, 2011 Dan

Isn't this a two-edged sword, though? By lowering the standards in overturning patent claims to a "preponderance of the evidence", even MS's patents are vulnerable to challenges especially from other big guns like IBM and Oracle.

Add Your Comment Now:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Redmond Tech Watch

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.