I should have covered this new "policy statement" from Verizon and Google long ago -- but, quite frankly, I was too irritated. Here is the short version, in case you aren't up on the news: The two companies are working on a plan to basically neuter net neutrality, allowing ISPs and their close partners to move towards a tiered service model where schlubs like you and me get slower service while commercial services move at lightning speeds.
I believe Verizon and Google are both evil, so I'm not surprised that they formed a pact to push to have existing capitalist entities (not necessary a bad thing) control the flow of Internet traffic. Right now, this is just a policy statement. The politicians have to go along with it too. But who has more dollars to spend on cruises, fancy meals and campaign contributions -- you and me, or the likes of Google and Verizon?
Is this either a stake in the ground or a stake in the heart of a free Internet? Tell us all which it is by writing [email protected].
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/16/2010 at 1:18 PM11 comments
Bill Cosby had a great routine in the '60s (yeah, I was a kid then) about hoof and mouth. Eric Schmidt has a similar affliction -- foot in mouth. Schmidt's latest bonehead comments involve Internet anonymity. Now remember, Schmidt had a conniption when a Web site published details of his life -- discovered through his own Web site!
Having somehow forgotten that horror, Eric now argues that none of us should be anonymous on the Web. (How can we be, when you take overhead shots of our houses and street-level views of our coming and goings?)
Schmidt's argument is that anonymous people on the Internet can do bad things. Duh. So the answer is to expose us all? Wouldn't that be a search engine's dream?
I do agree with Eric in one small sense: I wouldn't mind if you had to prove your age or identity to see the really crazy on the Web. That would be a kind of tier where my kids couldn't browse for the truly hideous, but consenting adults could.
Am I nuts or way ahead of the curve on this? Speak up at [email protected].
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/16/2010 at 4:59 PM4 comments
This may all be innocent fun, but given Google's privacy track record, it seems kinds creepy. It seems that a Google employee (or the company, itself) just bought a remote-controlled flying drone. Given all the spying that Google does, is this really the right PR move to make?
All I know is that folks in Redmond are looking up the sky wondering of Google will take pictures or drop something bad.
Is Google getting out of hand, or is your personal privacy worth sacrificing for the sake of better search? You tell me at [email protected].
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/16/2010 at 4:59 PM5 comments
One of thing that remains confusing in this whole Mark Hurd saga (the now semi-disgraced ex-chief of HP) is did he or didn't he?
He was accused of sexual harassment, which apparently didn't stick, but was fired for steering money towards a 50-year-old honey who used to appear in sexy movies. But both he and the gal claim nothing happened. Is Hurd lying or is he the quintessential high nerd who will do anything for the gal who's just out of reach? You tell me at [email protected]. With so many high-priced lawyers, we may never discover the truth.
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/11/2010 at 1:18 PM3 comments
If you or your staff aren't yet patching, you best get to steppin'. This month, Microsoft released 15 patches, including one out-of-band patch that isn't technically part of Patch Tuesday.
Sorry to sound like an old record, but the vast majority of fixes address remote execution flaws (you know, where a dirtbag hacker tries to hijack your machine).
Word from the experts is that implementing all these fixes will take some time and care -- especially as all these patches demand a system restart.
If you want all the deets, I suggest you go here.
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/11/2010 at 1:18 PM1 comments
Vendors loves to toss around the term "mission critical," as if every organization was NASA. Truth is, mission critical is in the eyes of the beholder. What's meaningless to you may be critical to me.
For those that truly care about data and uptime, Microsoft is offering the Dom Perignon of support -- a mission-critical add-on to the company's Premier program. When you pay the top shelf price, you expect top shelf service. In this case, you get a team of dedicated solutions engineers who promise to respond in a half hour (although, if 30 minutes of downtime is acceptable to a mission-critical system, how mission critical is it?). You'll also get 24x7 support.
Like an SLA, if Microsoft doesn't perform, you get some of your money back.
What is your impression of Microsoft support, or do you use another option. Talk about either at [email protected].
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/11/2010 at 1:18 PM1 comments
In honor of yesterday's Patch Tuesday, here are some reader thoughts on the Microsoft monthly tradition:
I have never been impressed with the thoroughness of Microsoft's development in regards to security. And I think it shows with the enormous amounts of patches that get distributed for every operating system and software program. I understand they can't catch everything, but wouldn't you think that after so many years of OS/software that you have to patch that it would be a good idea to secure systems before they come out -- instead of sending out ridiculous amounts of patches, which in turn usually slow machines/software down after so many get applied? But, what do I know? I am not a programmer.
As always, your columns and articles are informative and entertaining.
-Travis
I would like to see a comparison of patches released for other operating systems. I've seen similar lists in the past (maybe on CERN's site) that actually show MS operating systems require fewer patches than Mac OS and some Linux distributions. Your question is more relevant if compared to what competing operating systems require.
-Curtis
Whether I have two or 20 patches, if I have to reboot the server, the number of patches does not matter to me. Some people seem to make a big deal out of it. I'm just glad that bugs are being fixed. I'd rather have 20 patches, once a month, then have two patches this week, four more next week and so forth. And that's just my opinion...
-Bruce
I don't believe Microsoft has ever really been proactive about anything, and has been more of a reactive entity with regards to patches.
Although, maybe they are proactive in their new software and in the numerous ways they can just plain outright annoy you.
-Michael
Share your thoughts with the editors of this newsletter! Write to [email protected]. Letters printed in this newsletter may be edited for length and clarity, and will be credited by first name only (we do NOT print last names or e-mail addresses).
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/11/2010 at 1:18 PM2 comments
I'm not sure what to think of former HP CEO Mark Hurd. During the scandal of 2006 where HP spied on reporters and even its own board members, Chairwoman Barbara Dunn took the fall. Hurd sidestepped the whole situation and came up unscathed. My view was that, as CEO, he either knew or probably should have known what the board was up to -- especially after it hired a team of nine outside investigators to look into the matter.
But those that follow HP have praised Hurd's leadership and results. Now they must be a bit bummed that the man they admired resigned in the wake of a rather nasty scandal.
Apparently, Hurd steered company money towards an acquaintance's way -- which was looked at as inappropriate in the eyes of HP.
Was Hurd a good or bad thing for HP? You tell me at [email protected].
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/09/2010 at 1:18 PM3 comments
Here is some reader mail on the ultimate demise of IPv4 Internet addresses:
It is no different, Doug, than the switch to digital TV. It took the federal government setting a hard deadline to get the industry to make the move. Still, there are millions of analog TVs in the market that cable systems will have to support for the foreseeable future.
Millions were spent mitigating Y2K which would not have had to be spent if people had begun preparing for Y2K in the decades leading up to that hard deadline.
ISVs and OEMS slowness to adopt to Vista was what ultimately doomed that OS.
When they have to switch to IPv6, the will – and not a minute sooner. Will it cost millions more than it should? Yes! Late adopters invariably cost themselves millions more than they save by putting off the introduction of new technology.
-Marc
Internet Service Providers are not ready to support IPv6 to customers. I have talked with my AT&T representative many times about IPv6 and if they had it on their core network. They don't and are not supporting it yet.
SOOOO, this is a no starter for those with service providers that don't support it yet.
-Daryl
Here's one reader's preliminary complaint on the Windows Phone 7 platform:
I believe I have had every version of Windows Mobil released. For Microsoft to say Windows Phone 7 won't allow me to use my own flash card and not allow me to browse the phone from my own computer (so I could put my own songs on or grab my own pics without going through their network) really rubs me wrong. They are bound and determined to lose long-time customers like myself.
-Bill
Share your thoughts with the editors of this newsletter! Write to [email protected]. Letters printed in this newsletter may be edited for length and clarity, and will be credited by first name only (we do NOT print last names or e-mail addresses).
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/09/2010 at 1:18 PM1 comments
Microsoft has lost, lost again and lost once more in its patent dispute with i4i over how Word implements XML. Microsoft has already removed the offending code, but the company just doesn't like to lose. Now it appears it will be appealing this puppy all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
As I understand it, the Supreme Court is not all compelled to hear the case, and I'd argue there are a number of things more important for the court to consider than a patent suit -- which is already basically resolved.
Should these justices give this appeal the time of day, and if not, what is the most important issue they should deal with? Legal advice welcome at [email protected].
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/09/2010 at 1:18 PM3 comments
Research firm Computer Economics (great name, by the way) just wrapped up a survey pinpointing what you, the IT professional, plan to spend your company's hard-earned cash on. Surprising, at least to me, is a rush to either buy or upgrade ERP systems. This could be good news for Microsoft Dynamics, SAP and Oracle.
One item I'm not surprised made the list was Windows 7. Nearly a third of respondents are planning to spend cash on Win 7 upgrades this year. Many of these shops bought into Vista and want to get a far away from that dog as soon as possible.
While server virtualization has long been hot, desktop virtualization is now catching fire, with nearly a third already having invested in it.
Unified Communications is also on the upswing, with 40 percent of shops planning some kind of spend this year.
What are your IT priorities? Send you list, long or short, to [email protected].
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/09/2010 at 1:18 PM1 comments
Tuesday is coming. You know that means -- we're going to have a special guest. So wiggle your ears, like Mousketeers, cause Tuesdays is a special patch day.
With apologies to Anette Funicello, I bring you tidings of not quite great joy, as Microsoft is prepping its biggest load of patches ever.
Apparently, not willing to dish out an unlucky 13 fixes, Microsoft went for a solid 14. These patches cover pretty much the gamut -- Windows (of course), IE (of course), Office and Silverlight.
As usual, remote execution flaws lead the list. You can get all the details here.
In my opinion, the number of patches actually speaks more for Microsoft's diligence in hunting down flaws than intrinsic security flaws. Then again, I could be dead wrong. You, my faithful readers, are the real experts. So tell me, is Microsoft just getting better at patching, or is its software still fundamentally problematic? E-mail me at [email protected].
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/06/2010 at 1:18 PM2 comments