Foley on Microsoft

Will Microsoft’s Hardware-Upgrade Push Backfire?

The hardware demands of the next Windows and Office System 2006 products may prove to be not worth the effort for vendors and customers.

• By Mary Jo Foley
• 01/01/2006

The clash of Microsoft’s constituencies could surface in a major way as early as this year, when Microsoft is due to launch Windows Vista and a number of Office System 2006 products, including Exchange Server 12.

Microsoft is gunning to convince customers that its next-gen products are must-haves. At the same time, it has to convince its user base to move to brand-new high-end desktops and servers to exploit these new wares.

On the desktop front, Microsoft’s message is that Vista will work best on new PCs. While company officials have soft-peddled this point, the fact is that short of a graphics upgrade, only a small number of consumer PCs and even fewer business PCs (even those bought in the last year) are likely to support the highest Aero Glass interface that will ship with Vista.

Microsoft won’t finalize Vista’s hardware requirements until this summer, when the operating system is supposed to be released to manufacturing. Microsoft recommends that customers wanting to take full advantage of all Vista interface features buy machines with a discrete graphics card that supports its DirectX 9 graphics framework, Windows Display Driver Model, 32 bits-per-pixel (bpp) color depth, and at least 64MB of graphics RAM.

Those wishing to run Vista-optimized applications, such as the Max photo-sharing sample application Microsoft released at the Fall 2005 Professional Developers Conference, will need PCs with at least a 2.4GHz processor, 512MB of RAM and a graphics card capable of handling the Windows Presentation Foundation (aka “Avalon”) subsystem.

On the server front, Microsoft has been less cagey about upgrade requirements. But for users, the end game will be similar.

In mid-November Microsoft listed a number of 64-bit only OS and application products, including Exchange 12, the forthcoming Windows Midmarket Server (code-named “Centro”), Windows Longhorn Small Business Server, and Windows Longhorn Server R2 (due in 2009 or later).

Microsoft has lined up some convincing performance reasons for customers to move to 64-bit. And company officials have even taken to beating the security drum, highlighting, for instance, the greater rootkit resilience offered by 64-bit systems.

But will those advantages be enough to move product? Market researchers, including Gartner Inc. and Directions on Microsoft, sounded the warning alarms shortly after Microsoft made its 64-bit-only intentions known. Both outfits predict the 64-bit requirement will result in a slow upgrade curve for Exchange 12, at the very least.

While there’s little doubt that most customers will be looking at, if not already running, 64-bit hardware by 2009, the same can’t be said for 2006. New servers sold this year and next will be, by and large, 64-bit machines; but not all server customers are upgrading in the foreseeable future. In fact, I’d argue that many of the small and midsize business customers Microsoft is targeting with Exchange 12, Centro and Windows Longhorn Small Business Server will be running older 32-bit systems for some time.

There are other problems, too -- 64-bit drivers are still slow in coming, and there aren’t a whole lot of native 64-bit applications out there. And new PCs and servers don’t grow on trees.

So while Microsoft’s hardware-upgrade messages are no doubt making its hardware partners ecstatic, users are likely to be less thrilled.

What’s your take? Will customers happily upgrade not just their Microsoft software, but also PCs and servers, in one fell swoop? Or could Microsoft’s hardware-upgrade push backfire? Write me at [email protected] and let me know what you think.