The economy might be in the dumps, but don't tell that to Google who has enough spare cash to shell out $12.5 billion to buy Motorola's Mobility Division.
Motorola is a big Android proponent. The deal gives Google soup to nuts control over the cell phone hardware and software, much as Apple has with the iPhone.
One possible negative drawback for Google over the acquisition is that the buy may anger other Android hardware makers who could be lured into the Microsoft camp.
More
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/15/20110 comments
Gartner sees a great future for Windows 7, claiming that at the beginning of next year 42 percent of PCs will be running the OS. The research house believes that IT budgets are getting healthier, giving IT the cash to migrate off of XP and Vista.
Another report from Net Applications places Win 7 share at 28 percent, Vista a 9 percent and XP at less than 50 percent.
More
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/15/20110 comments
Keeping PCs and servers patched seemingly never ends. Microsoft feels your pain and recently released a 30-page report full of advice to make patching easier.
One notion that surprised me is the idea of only installing critical fixes and forgetting about less important patches. Maybe that is a common and safe practice, but I just assumed all patches should ultimately get installed.
More
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/15/20110 comments
Apple owns the financial markets, but Microsoft still owns the enterprise desktop. And it'll remain that way for at least the near future. Gartner's latest and greatest research foresees Windows 7 on nearly all but 6 percent of PCs being shipped well into 2012. OS X might seem like an afterthought, at only 4.5 percent of the total.
But what if things were the other way around? What if Apple had 94 percent? Apple has been making its mark in the consumer space with its iPhones and iPads. With these products becoming serious business tools, it's bound to have an effect on the enterprise at some point. With Macs nearly at price parity with Windows machines, it would take some brave IT admins to suggest turning the enterprise into an Apple-only shop.
More
Posted by Michael Domingo on 08/12/201114 comments
Even though my high school back in 1982 had some Apple II boxes, the first computer I learned to program on was a Commodore PET -- yes, the one that used cassettes for storage. The original PET (and Apple II, for that matter) were introduced back in 1977, preceding IBM's PC by three years. But the original IBM boxes are very much the ancestors of the modern-day desktops we continue to use at home and in businesses globally.
More
Posted by Michael Domingo on 08/12/201110 comments
Microsoft exec Charlie Kindel announced he will be stepping down after 21 years with Redmond to start his own company. Most recently he has been the general manager of Microsoft's Windows Phone Developer Experience. This department's focus is on bringing third-party app developers to the Windows Phone 7 platform.
While the platform had the distinction of being the fastest mobile OS to reach 10,000 apps under Kindel's governance, its overall total is still just a drop in the bucket compared to Apple's and Google's mobile platforms.
More
Posted by Chris Paoli on 08/10/20116 comments
Here are a couple of comments on Google's recent patent acquisitions:
A recent This American Life episode covered this sort of thing thoroughly, and what I learned there would lead me to believe that Google is probably acting defensively.
There are companies that have bought tens of thousands of patents, then offer to charge for a kind of 'insurance' to protect tech companies from patent lawsuits. This is basically the same thing the mafia does to shake down local businesses and 'protect' them from arson, theft, etc. It's all done in the name of 'innovation,' but the net effect is that it is stifling innovation and even causing some smaller companies to go out of business when they're either shaken down or sued for infringement by a company that has done nothing but purchased a bogus patent.
What's needed is serious patent law reform.
-Greg
Of course patents are necessary. Everyone should be able to benefit financially from their own inventions. That is not to say that the system isn't broken. It certainly is. Patents used to die with the inventor. Not any more!
My guess is that Google didn't actually buy patents from IBM but that Google licensed these patents from IBM. IBM patents are pretty much bullet-proof. (Few companies can defend their patent portfolio more successfully than IBM.) This defense strategy pretty much guarantees that any plaintiff suing Google for patent infringement is also suing IBM on the same grounds -- and who is going to do that?
Further, IBM has such a depth of patents that it probably has one for every one of Google's needs. If Google actually bought these patents, you can be sure that IBM retains its rights to use the patents.
-Marc
More
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/10/20110 comments
I hope you're sitting down for this breaking news: It actually takes some time (and patience) to develop secure mobile applications.
This radical train of thought, which came out at last week's CompTIA's Tech Summit on Cybersecurity in Washington, goes against the traditional way of thinking that if you close your eyes and hit a bunch of buttons, applications will secure themselves.
More
Posted by Chris Paoli on 08/10/20110 comments
A former Microsoft executive will replace Vivek Kundra as the new Federal CIO, we learned last week. Steven VanRoekel was a senior director for Microsoft's Windows Server Solutions group and also aided Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates on "speech and strategy" issues, among other accomplishments.
Federal IT policy will now be set by a former Microsoft official. It will be one of many efforts where Microsoft stays close to Washington lawmakers to influence the public agenda. Microsoft is also engaged at the governmental level with rewriting U.S. patent laws by supporting the America Invents Act. The company also advocates changes to immigration policies to speed up the visa permit process for talented foreigners, as well as educational reforms to better focus on developing skills that might be used to produce better U.S. programmers or IT professionals.
More
Posted by Kurt Mackie on 08/08/20111 comments
Patch Tuesday comes tomorrow, and it's looking like a lucky 13 batch. Two patches are expected to be "critical" to apply. All are expected to require a restart.
IT pros, as opposed to home Windows users it seems, are supposed to test each security bulletin first before pushing it out on the network. And then do that 13 times, possibly while wearing wreaths of garlic, or something like that. Well, no. Here's what Microsoft's best practices publication says:
More
Posted by Kurt Mackie on 08/08/201117 comments
Microsoft is offering a $200,000 first prize to someone who can create a technology that wards off Windows exploits. It's called a BlueHat Prize, with submissions open until April 1, 2012. Apparently, this is a real thing, despite the April Fools Day submission date.
The prize winner needs to offer an innovative defense, "rather than discovering individual issues," to win the $200,000 first prize. There's also a $50,000 second place prize, plus lifetime MSDN subscriptions for third- and fourth-place winners.
More
Posted by Kurt Mackie on 08/08/20111 comments
Here are some more reader thoughts on the end of support for Windows XP:
Win XP is going away...finally! I hate to say it, but those that are in love with it need to move on. I always thought IT needed to stay one step ahead of our end-users. IT becomes irrelevant or unnecessary when those we support are using more current systems at home than we can provide.
My organization has 10K+ machines at this time. Half are Windows 7, and I hope to upgrade or replace the rest by the end of 2012. Wish me luck!
-Chris
I am a volunteer admin for a church. Most of the machines are running Win XP Pro with three being 64 bit, and only four are Win 7 Pro 64 bit. The XP boxes are stable, save for the fact that most are working on eight-year-old hardware. Yes, I have had to replace a few HDDs, power supplies and a motherboard -- the usual stuff. The Win 7 boxes are OK, but they don't seem to work nice with some of the firewall add-ons. It looks like I'll have to rejoin some of them to the domain. Other than that, everything is OK. I do set the swap space to a static 2x of the RAM and that does make a difference for me. Further, everyone is just a plain user too. No one has complained about strange behavior from Office. While performance may not be optimal, it is understandable due to the old hardware. Some of the boxes only have 512 MB of RAM. At this point I'd rather put the money into completely new hardware with a Win 7 upgrade at the same time. As with most non-profits, the money is just not flowing.
-Peter
Well, you probably know already how I feel. I've got no sympathy for anyone who has not moved on to Windows 7 (or other viable Windows XP replacement) by now. (This is not about Windows vs. Macintosh vs. Linux.)
Those in the enterprise should have started looking at Windows 7 the day it hit the streets. And by the release of SP1, they should have been ready for the transition to Windows 7.
End users can use Windows XP as long as they want but they have no right to complain that Microsoft has not given them enough time. After all, it has been four years since Windows Vista was released and the looming deadline for XP support is still nearly three years away!
If you have a computer purchased as long ago as mid-2006, it will run Windows 7 and the upgrade price is $120. If needed, extra RAM will cost under $20 per GB.
Further, from my experience, Windows 7 outperforms Windows XP on the same Windows 7 MINIMUM hardware requirements.
It seems to me that this is a small investment for the advances in security and usability offered by Windows 7.
Need new hardware for Windows 7? Windows 7 hardware (Dell) starts at $300 ($430 with a monitor). Netbooks start at $300 as well and full Windows 7 laptops start at $450.
These are excellent prices for modern Windows 7 hardware.
If the end-user wants to wait until mid-2014, more power to them but 'late adopters' are no better off (and are usually worse off) than 'early adopters' when it comes to the cost of transitioning to a new operating system. Being under a looming deadline makes that process just that much more painful.
Staying with Windows XP in 2011 is one of those 'pennywise, pound foolish' decisions.
-Marc
More
Posted by Doug Barney on 08/08/20112 comments