Apple has one of the best reputations in American business today. Its products
are revered, its CEO is idolized and its stock has been put on a high-priced
pedestal.
All this obscures some rather troubling facts: Its computers are overpriced
and because they're from a single source, many enterprises are forced to steer
clear. And as the king of the Mac, iPod and iPhone platforms, Apple rules with
an iron fist.
The latest downer is how Apple is treating iPhone developers. You'd think Apple
would want as many iPhone apps as possible, what with Google set to enter the
market and Microsoft already a longtime player. As John Belushi might have said,
"But noooooo!" If your app competes with Apple's own software,
there's no place for you
in the iPhone store.
Ever wonder how cool things would be if Steve Jobs and Bill Gates traded places?
How would Apple and Microsoft be different with this kind of switch? Random
conjecture welcome at [email protected].
Posted by Doug Barney on 09/29/2008 at 1:16 PM0 comments
Remember some time around 2000 when Steve Ballmer said tech stocks were overpriced,
and months later the tech bubble burst? Ballmer was right about those stocks,
and nearly all of them, including his own, took a beating.
While I wasn't happy that Ballmer was right back then, I'll be pleased
if he's right this time around. Last week, in three separate speeches, Mr. Ballmer
argued that the
tech sector had "buoyancy" and wouldn't collapse despite
the Wall Street debacle. In fact, he has so much faith in his company that Microsoft
is buying back $40 billion worth of MSFT shares.
Posted by Doug Barney on 09/29/2008 at 1:15 PM0 comments
Here are more of your thoughts on Microsoft's new "I'm a PC" ads:
The "I'm a PC" ads are much improved over the Seinfeld ad!
The Seinfeld ad was funny and quirky, but really failed to get the message
across. I like how the "I'm a PC" ad directly addresses the Apple
commercial. It does a nice job of eliminating the spin Apple tries to put
on PC users as un-cool, nerdy business types. It effectively shows that a
wide variety of people in a wide variety of scenarios choose to rely on Windows-based
PCs because they do work super-well, regardless of the Apple spin. Why Microsoft
did not do this from the start is puzzling! Is this commercial 3.0? It must
be, because MS finally got it right!
The Mojave Experiment commercial and Web site is also a good effort to
calm the Vista misconception storm. Bravo, MS! Your marketing efforts are
looking much, much better now!
-Jason
I'm a PC for now...but just out of necessity!
I wonder if Microsoft is having problems with its ad campaign because
most of the creative minds in the advertising industry use Macs. It just seems
like millions of dollars should be able to buy higher-quality ads than what
we've seen. I guess we could give Microsoft the benefit of the doubt and maybe,
just maybe, it's saving the best for last.
-Richard
I don't see the "I'm a PC" ads as defensive, but rather as mocking.
MS took the bull by the horns -- a gutsy move, in my book.
-Bernie
The latest MS ads are even more reason to buy Mac. Keep up the good work,
MS! The world is laughing at you. Doesn't Microsoft know that "PC"
equals "Piece of Crap"?
The one where the "regular Joe" people are shown the "Mojave
Experiment" then told it's Vista...they must have pulled those morons
out of the Mojave. If they didn't know Vista and how badly it sucks, why should
they have any credibility?
-Tom
Join the fray! Leave a comment below or send an e-mail to [email protected].
Posted by Doug Barney on 09/29/2008 at 1:16 PM0 comments
In 1996, Oracle made a run at the hardware with The Network Computer, which
as I recall was a $200 dumb terminal that used the Internet to serve up corporate
and consumer apps. PCs at the time were cheap enough -- and Web apps lame enough
-- that it never worked.
Now Oracle is back
in the hardware saddle, this time with a vastly different and higher-end
strategy. This time, the Oracle hardware is designed to support a massive database
server and a separate storage appliance.
The move is more about packaging than innovation. Oracle will simply blend
its software with HP hardware. Still, moves like this make it easier for IT
to buy, install, operate and maintain systems, so there's a clear net plus.
Posted by Doug Barney on 09/29/2008 at 1:16 PM0 comments
Your verdicts are in: The new Microsoft
"I'm
a PC" commercials aren't exactly worse than the Seinfeld ones...but
that's not saying a whole lot:
I too have seen the "I'm a PC" commercial (at least the first
one). I don't know if it's defensive or not, but it's not persuasive. For
one thing, even though I use a PC, I am NOT a PC. Nor am I "PC,"
although that's a whole other discussion. For another, "PC" is a
generic enough term that it's arbitrary to imply that if it's a PC, the thing
is automatically a Windows computer. Finally, even though the commercial I
saw showed different people using their PCs for different activities, it largely
showed someone simply making a claim.
What I'd like to see instead is something along the lines of this: "My
PC is me." HP has the tagline "The computer is personal again."
Why shouldn't Microsoft make use of something similar? I'd prefer to see a
real profile of someone using their PC for interesting activities, rather
than just a talking head saying, "I'm a PC, too." Microsoft has
partnerships with enough major PC vendors that it could do tie-ins if it wanted.
Microsoft just needs to do something different than what it's doing (and has
done) so far in its massive ad campaign. I, for one, don't think they're getting
their $300 million's worth.
-Dennis
I read your review of the "I'm a PC" commercials and thought
it was a bit harsh. The new ad is leaps and bounds better than the Seinfeld
ad (mostly because Bill is not in it). Actually, Bill is so goofy that any
ad he would be in would ruin it. That said, the new ad has integrity and shows
real people doing amazing things with the technology. I am happy Microsoft
is finally responding with any kind of ad, actually. It has been tread on
by Apple for for too long. I will admit the marketing machine at M$ needs
a lot of polish.
-Charles
Really incredibly poor ad. It says nothing. (Are you sure that Apple didn't
pay for it?) More and more, it seems like Microsoft is really out of touch.
-Howard
I think the main point of the ads is that while a Mac can SAY how great
it is, the fact is that the majority of the world uses a PC!
-Anonymous
The "I'm a PC" ads do a good job of overcoming the myth that
only Macs work well. I would like them to go further and say exactly what
users like about the PCs. For instance, a Mac ad states that Macs can run
Microsoft Office. If I were Microsoft, I would want a PC ad to compare the
amount of third-party compatible software and hardware for Macs with PCs.
I want to see comparisons of the quantity of qualified support people for
Mac vs. the PC.
Given the necessary resources and accepting the limitations of each operating
systems, all computers can work well and I am happy for the diversity. Many
of my clients only call me after hours of unsuccessful phone OEM support.
My PC clients are frustrated by their phone support. My Mac clients accept
that phone support didn't help without complaint. Can anyone tell me why the
perception is different?
-Earl
I myself find the "I am a PC" commercials confusing and contradictory.
If you think about it, the PCs are still a market leader and they perform
all the functions that we need them to in one form or another. The commercials
are not explaining or saying anything to me other than, "We are all different
and we all have our own weaknesses." And what I mean by weakness is the
inconsistency of hardware quality. As unique and different as we all are,
we are also frail and easy to break if we try to be the cheapest thing out
there.
This is exactly why Apple is of such a high quality, including in price.
The design is wonderful, performance is amazing, and it is gaining ground
because of the opinion that it has a stable OS that is easy to learn and master,
and owning one means a sense of longevity.
-Albert
The Gates-Sienfeld ads were STUPID! In fact, they were beyond stupid and
rank in stupidity next to the "brilliant minds" who gave us the
current financial meltdown.
The current ads are better, but why not try the simple approach? Something
like what Sprint did with its CEO talking about how they can personalize the
handheld telecommunication box to your needs, rather than spending $300 million
on a STUPID Sienfeld ad. Microsoft could've used the money to pay some American
developers to test the Chinese-developed Vista OS for bugs and trap doors.
That way, MS could've blunted Apple's so-called superiority, as far as system
security goes.
-Anonymous
I have to agree with your assessment. How about an ad that directly refutes
the so-called "myths"? These ads just make it seem like they are
in fact true. It will fail to convince those that need to be.
The "Mojave experiment" is even sillier -- nobody ever said
Vista didn't LOOK good.
-Anonymous
Bill thinks Microsoft made another misstep when it decided to buy
back $40 billion of its own shares:
I have to disagree. While the stock buyback is an excellent indicator
of the strength of Microsoft's balance sheet and fiscal position, it is also
an excellent indicator that the company is running out of ideas.
Apparently, they are sitting on a mountain of cash and 1) they can't
find (or can't make a deal on) other companies or products worth buying, or
2) they can't think of anything internally in which they can invest. Stock
buybacks are, to me, a sign of a company that has lost its vision.
-Bill
In the spirit of Doug's "Speak Out on VMware and Chrome" item, here
are a few of you doing just that:
I'm eager for VMware to virtualize more. The best part is the company's
focus on quality in both the underlying technology and the management tools.
I don't have to be an ESX expert to configure and operate the tools. Assuming
VMware maintains this ability to make intuitive, stable products that ease
labor, I'm eager to buy, deploy and use them.
-Milton
Chrome is OK, I guess. I remember that when I started using Firefox, I
practically gave up IE immediately. With Chrome, it seems that I have to keep
reminding myself that I have it, and want to try it out. There is nothing
there that excites me about it.
-Jason
I downloaded Chrome a couple weeks ago, and other than a few sites that
aren't supporting it too well yet, I've been truly impressed. As an Internet
application developer I really get off on the memory usage, multiprocess-oriented
tabs and "Inspect element" feature. It's great for analyzing what
exactly ASP.NET or any other framework is shipping down to the client. I love
the internal task manager with the "Stats for nerds." At work, we're
currently doing some final performance testing before we implement into production
and would love to be able to use Chrome to help distinguish basic memory usage
issues. But alas, my company is much too bureaucratic for useful tools to
be downloaded willy-nilly.
My only complaint is that I haven't found add-ins like in Firefox. So
from a user perspective, I'd say I still like Firefox better, but as a developer
I'm quickly shedding my ties to all other browsers.
-Seth
One reader has a bone to pick with a recent
news item that said most botnets come from the U.S.:
According to SecureWorks, 20.6 million attacks originated from U.S. computers
and 7.7 million from Chinese computers. But that's meaningless unless you
normalize that to the number of users with wideband connections in each country.
-Anonymous
And, since it's on everyone else's mind, Bruce shares his 2 cents on the current
economic situation:
Hell yes, the AIG investors should bear the brunt of the fallout! I agree
with you wholeheartedly: The investors in those companies should bear the
brunt of them failing -- NOT the general public. There needs to be a constitutional
amendment against bailouts. Yes, I'm a card carrying Libertarian.
-Bruce
Tune in next week for even more reader letters -- including more of your reviews
of Microsoft's new ad campaign. Meanwhile, tell us what you think by commenting
below or sending an e-mail to [email protected].
Posted by Doug Barney on 09/25/2008 at 1:16 PM0 comments
Readers recall where they were on the morning of the Sept. 11 attacks:
I was on my way to a technical college -- a Windows Server 2000 class.
The first news report I heard said a traffic helicopter hit one of the towers.
I remember thinking how odd that was. The instructor had the TV on during
the entire class. We all sat in horror as the towers came down and as more
planes crashed. My nephew, then 14, was frantic until he found out his mother
was safe (she is a flight attendant for United). He had recently lost his
father. My niece and her family live in Manhattan. Her husband works close
to the towers. Again we were frantic for knowledge that he was safe.
I didn't lose any immediate family that day, but I think all of us lost
from our American family. How did we as Americans start to gloss over this
horrible event so fast? I heard we have an attention span of about two weeks.
I think it's shorter.
-Barb
I had just walked out my front door to go to work. Finding that my car
had been broken into, I went back into the house and called the cops. While
waiting for the police to arrive, I turned on the TV. The news was just breaking;
everyone was speculating on whether this was an accident or an act of terror.
Then on live TV, we all got our answer as the second tower was hit. When the
cops showed up, that police report just didn't seem quite as important. This
showed me that even when you think you are having a bad day, you really should
go back and count your blessings.
-William
I was on-site at a client office in the medical center in Houston, where
we live. Colleagues called me out to the area sitting room to watch the news
of the first one. I was touched by the loss of life, digested that, and returned
to my desk. After a while came the news of No. 2. I returned to watch and
listen. After taking in the images for a few minutes, my heart sank. My wife
was in downtown Houston, at her job, on the 44th floor of one of the tallest
buildings in Houston. I went immediately to the phone, called her, said something
really stupid, then got my wits and told her to leave the building immediately.
Of course our family was safe. There was no threat in Houston. We have
counted our blessings many times since that day, sometimes in remembrance
of that day. Thank you for taking a moment to remember it, and to invite reflection.
Our hearts go out to those who lost loved ones on that horrific day. Special
sadness comes over me each time I think of the brave responders running into
those buildings and helping others exit. My heart breaks for each innocent
life lost.
-Rick
I had the unusual distinction of being in both New York and Washington
on 9/11 and saw both the Twin Towers and the Pentagon just before they were
hit. You may recall that Jeff Immelt had the unfortunate timing of taking
over GE from Jack Welch on Sept. 10. Jeff scheduled a live satellite video
feed to introduce himself companywide (worldwide) to over 330,000 employees.
I am based in Washington, D.C. and flew to White Plains, N.Y. to work on that
project at a Danbury, Conn. building.
I was scheduled to fly home to D.C. the night of Sept. 10, but a big
thunderstorm came in and grounded all of the flights. I got a hotel in White
Plains and a reservation on a flight out the next morning. The flight took
off at about 8 and I flew over Manhattan at about 8:20 (the first plane hit
the tower at about 8:45). I had a window seat on the left as we headed south.
We flew just west of Manhattan and I got a magnificent view of the city. I
recall thinking how I never grow tired of seeing the city from that perspective.
By the time we landed at Washington National, the place was buzzing.
No one was quite sure what to do. They knew about New York, but had not yet
grounded all flights. I got in my car and started heading to my office in
Northern Virginia. The route took me up the George Washington Parkway, which
goes right next to the Pentagon (they have since moved the road a few hundred
feet to the east so it is not as close). Shortly after I passed the Pentagon
at about 9:40, the radio announcers said there was smoke coming from the Pentagon.
I looked in my rearview mirror and saw it firsthand. It was all still very
confusing and surreal. The gravity of the situation did not kick in until
I got to my office and saw the second tower fall on live TV.
-Mark
I was working at my job in Columbus, Ohio (systems analyst with a large
insurance company). When the first plane hit, we turned on a TV in our break
room and watched as the events of that morning unfolded. I could not help
but feel a deep sense of loss, but could not put my finger on exactly what.
Having grown up in New York City, I had many friends and relatives living
there. Friends who worked in Lower Manhattan. My cousin's wife was on her
way to work, but was not in the immediate area yet. Another friend was out
of town that day.
Later, I learned that 11 high school mates were in the towers. Seven
of them were firemen, and one had been in my graduating class. Two members
of the sports car club that I race with were on Flight 63. To this day, I
wear the pin from the fire department I belonged to in Upstate New York, and
carry memorials on the sides of my race car. I also proudly wear the unit
patch from the fire station that my classmate belonged to.
-Anonymous
On 9/11, I was in Houston with three other co-workers. We were expanding
our office there and we had brought in two new racks with new hardware. We
were eating breakfast at the hotel before we went into the office and the
TV was on, showing the WTC and talking about how a plane had hit one of the
buildings. With shock and confusion, people watched the TV, some standing,
some still eating. Then the second plane hit the other building while we were
all watching.
Knowing this was not TV but reality was completely heart-stopping. I
called my daughter as she was in New York with her dad. They typically take
the subway train which passes through the WTC on up to mid-town. Thankfully,
they had not even gotten up yet. I called home to Virginia to check on the
rest of my family. I have a sister whose husband worked at the Pentagon. She
had not heard from him, and by this time a plane had hit there. She was understandably
in a panic. As the day went on she finally got in touch with him; he was helping
people within the Pentagon who had been hurt.
Several days later, our work in Dallas completed, I remember sitting
out by the pool, still seething with anger over the attack...and in the late
evening sunset, an airplane finally took into the air. After the skies above
Dallas had been empty of jets, this was a small but significant event, and
I was proud. I got on an airplane the next day and the airport was fairly
empty. All the employees and passengers were at high alert. I have always
enjoyed flying and this day the flight seemed special. The clouds below the
wing more fluffy, the land far below more rugged, the people, with or without
fear, pushing forward.
-Karen
I was in the dean's office of the engineering college at Ohio Northern
University for my work study. The exec assistant came in and said that one
of the towers was hit. When I went down to watch, the Pentagon had been hit.
It was amazing how the university came together that day and you could walk
down the hallway of the dorms and hear CNN without missing a beat.
I remember calling my mom and she said that this event would be, for
me, like the assassination of JFK was for her. The world would never be the
same.
-Lora
A couple of you share more of your thoughts on Vista:
It is easy to fix Vista. Just demand that people buy hardware that will
run Vista well. Apple sells Macs based on quality, not price. HP, Dell, etc.
sell PCs based on price. I tried Vista on a relatively low-end computer but
it was duo-core with 2GB RAM. It ran badly. I put it on a quadcore with 4GB
RAM and it runs well.
Some of the things Vista users hate, Mac users accept without hesitation.
One example is Vista demanding Administrator credentials to install programs
or updates. Mac does the same thing. I support Windows, Macs and Linux. I
prefer Windows, even Vista, to the Mac OS.
-Earl
I'm currently working as a consultant at Microsoft and want to admit full-disclosure
to that fact when I give my opinion on the subject. Vista was hard to get
used to at first, I agree. There were many pieces of software that didn't
incorporate the new rules for coding or new locations of files that wouldn't
run on it. There were also hardware issues -- you couldn't just load Vista
onto any old machine and expect it to perform.
I'm now happy to say we're past those problems. Most IBM-compatible machines
are now built with the intention of running Vista and most software has been
upgraded to be compatible with it, as well. It's like any new platform/software/system
you have to learn. Once you get used to it, you have a hard time using something
that doesn't have the latest features.
-Sharon
And readers chime with their thoughts on the virtualization front:
I would like to see VMware refugees make an even cooler package that
will make money and kick others in the pants. Maybe a suite of virtual IP
6-based "hardware" or multiple virtual RAID arrays. With the failover
abilities that are out there now with VMware, I think they may have many more
ideas up there.
-Anonymous
The question shouldn't be whether Hyper-V is a viable competitor to VMware.
It should be whether the hypervisor matters at all. And though it does today,
that won't be the case for very long. The hypervisor is a commodity and all
the vendors know it. Microsoft made a huge play with the System Center Virtual
Manager and that is going to be worth way more money and market share to them
than having Hyper-V out there.
-Seth
Check in tomorrow for more reader letters! In the meantime, share your thoughts
by leaving a comment below, or sending an e-mail to [email protected].
Posted by Doug Barney on 09/25/2008 at 1:16 PM0 comments
I'm doing two articles that I may want to quote you on. The first is about Chrome,
which we've talked about quite a bit. I'm writing a Reader Review, which means
you and your peers are the actual reviewers. Share your Chrome thoughts by writing
me at
[email protected]. Over
a dozen already have.
The second article is about VMware and its plans for a datacenter operating
system, one that promises to turn all your x86 servers, network connections
and storage into a single utility. The company claims 70 percent of this functionality
is already in place. VMware users and others can contact me at [email protected]
and I'll shoot you a bunch of questions.
Both of these articles show how Redmond magazine is driven by readers
as much as it is by our writers and editors. So thanks!
Posted by Doug Barney on 09/25/2008 at 1:16 PM0 comments
Earlier
this week, I talked about Microsoft's new HPC 2008, a supercomputer-style
version of the OS based on clusters aimed at scientists, engineers and massive
data-mining/massaging apps.
I lamented the fact these high-end OSes and hardware don't mean much to mainstream
IT -- that we're missing out on all that power. In fact, most of our cores,
especially on the desktop, go unused (I wrote about that problem in this
cover story).
Microsoft is one step ahead of me, at least when it comes to HPC 2008, and
is now positioning this clustering tool right
at IT. Hopefully its hardware partners, such as Cray, will go along for
the ride and give us commodity supercomputers that run database, e-mail and
even Web apps. This could give the Crays and the SGIs a whole new lease on life.
Posted by Doug Barney on 09/25/2008 at 1:16 PM0 comments
I've had a lot of questions about Windows 7 lately, such as whether it has a
brand-new microkernel or is instead a rehashed version of Vista. Some of the
questions will be
answered
late next month at Microsoft's Professional Developers Conference (PDC),
where attendees will get a pre-beta version (didn't this used to be called an
alpha?) on a handy USB drive.
My new question: How many folks will go to PDC just to get a free 160GB flash
drive?
Meanwhile, the Engineering Windows 7 blog, which was dormant since its inception,
is gaining serious steam. Check it out.
Posted by Doug Barney on 09/25/2008 at 1:15 PM0 comments
The Google phone is
nearly
ready to rock. And while it has nowhere near the fanfare of the iPhone,
this is clearly a significant product. The idea is the phone will tie closely
to Google search and apps, making it easy to find information, get maps and
perhaps feed Google all your personal information.
From all reports, the Google phone (sold only by T-Mobile) is fully featured.
But the real keys are usability, reliability and how well these features work.
It took Microsoft a long time to get phones right, and even Apple has had its
hiccups (and Apple has been building operating systems since 1976, way before
Microsoft got into the game).
But is the real play Android, the OS that drives the Google phone? Could this
be the basis of a range of intelligent devices that ultimately replace our laptops
and desktops and thin clients? PC World weighs
in on this without reaching any major conclusions.
Are you excited about the Google phone? Don't call -- e-mail your answers to
me at [email protected].
Posted by Doug Barney on 09/25/2008 at 1:15 PM0 comments
We in the U.S. love to point fingers at overseas hackers, phishers and Internet
vagabonds. To many of us, the threats are in Bulgaria, China and Russia. The
reality, apparently, is much closer to home --
the
problem is us.
According to research from SecureWorks, most botnet attacks (those nasties
where a hacker uses your computer to attack others) start right here in the
good, old USA.
Posted by Doug Barney on 09/24/2008 at 1:15 PM0 comments
On Monday, I
lamented
the loss of the Seinfeld Microsoft ads, which have been replaced by the
"I'm a PC" commercials.
Here's my review: First, the commercials, by taking on Apple's characters,
are overly defensive. Last time I checked, Windows was still the market leader.
The commercials sound like a high school student who was stood up at the prom.
And while they point out that Windows is effective for many, many people, they
don't articulate what's so great about it.
The PC revolution has inspired our global economy, led to many technical and
creative inventions, changed our very culture, and made the world more unified
through nearly ubiquitous communication. Grandparents talk to grandkids a hundred
or more miles away, college students e-mail parents...and not always to ask
for money!
PCs are also a stunningly great bargain. With so many providers, prices steadily
fall, and this commodity hardware is able to run everything from XP to all the
major flavors of Linux (note that I left out Mac OS and Vista).
The PC industry has many things to be proud of, none of which I saw in these
commercials. Maybe that will be in the next batch.
Are you a PC? Thoughts on these ads welcome at [email protected].
Posted by Doug Barney on 09/24/2008 at 1:16 PM0 comments