Never Again

Listen to the People You Hire

Communication problems with upper management set one company back a couple grand.

I work at the corporate headquarters of a small company, where we have about 250 local computers. When we initially moved into the building in the early 1990s, Cat5 cable was a new product. We knew networking was moving in that direction, but had very little experience with the technology.

The IT director, my boss at the time, ran several bids for phone and network drops. He ultimately decided to go with the lowest bid. He chose a company that I've always referred to as "Big Al's Brand Cabling Company."

Growing Pains
As the years passed, our company grew. I acquired numerous network engineering certifications, moved into management and hired my own network staff. The IT director became CIO and hired a new IT director who had little background in the company or even in networking.

As we moved to 100Base-T networks, we experienced many problems due to the poor initial job of wiring. Cables were constantly pulled over florescent lighting, the jacks and patch panels weren't Cat5-compliant and the sheeting had been consistently pulled back about three inches before the cables were punched.

The new IT director, my direct supervisor, decided that the company needed a "network assessment" and put out bids to numerous vendors. Between him and the CIO, they found a particular company to do the job for $50,000. During numerous meetings leading up to the assessment, I frequently suggested that we get the cabling problems fixed before doing the network assessment so it would actually amount to something.

My chief network engineer fully agreed with me, and pointed this out in several meetings. However, upper management continued to disagree. In fact, at one point, the CIO actually pounded his fist on the conference table several times exclaiming, "We do not have a cabling problem!"

Professional Assessment
Then the network assessment began. The company that did the assessment used a software package that was the equivalent of a sniffer on steroids. The product produced some really nice graphs of what the network looked like. After they completed their assessment, they came up with only one suggestion or solution: Get the cabling fixed. (This company also happened to be in the cabling business.)

What's Your Worst IT Nightmare?

Write up your story in 300-600 words and e-mail it to Editor at Large Jeff Schwartz at jschwartz@redmondmag.com. Use "Never Again" as the subject line and be sure to include your contact information for story verification.

After spending an additional $22,000 with them, all we got were new network jacks and patch panels. We used the existing cables even though they were pulled incorrectly. Many of the jacks were re-punched and tested after hours when the lights were off. To this day, my staff continues to move cables from florescent lighting as we find problems.

Costly Resolution
For the money we paid for the patch panel and jack work alone, we could have had all the Cat5 cabling re-pulled correctly. In my opinion, we never got anything for our money regarding the network assessment. That was such a waste. In fact, for the same amount of money, we could have purchased our own copy of the product that they used to do the assessment.

The bottom line is that if you don't trust your network administrators and heed what they're telling you, you need to hire new ones.

About the Author

The submitter of this "Never Again" story wishes to remain anonymous.

comments powered by Disqus

Reader Comments:

Fri, Aug 22, 2008 Roger Zan Hartsdale

There's an arrogant managemt type in IT in almost every company I have worked for, whether I was an employee or a consultant. These "managers", if you can call them that, come out of their business schools with with an MBA and a false sense that they are somehow more technical or savvier than us true IT professionals who have years of experience working in the trenches and should not be dismissed and brushed off when we say that something is a bad idea. The director in this case had his head in the sand and should have been the one fired for incompetence and gross negligence. This is a clear example of what's known as the "Peter Principle" in which this so called IT director was most likely promoted to his own level of incompetence. As long as there are people in management who think they are known it alls, such problems will not go away anytime soon.

Wed, Aug 20, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

"The bottom line is that if you don't trust your network administrators and heed what they're telling you, you need to hire new ones."

The bottom line is that the IT Director needs to be FIRED.

Mon, Aug 4, 2008 06dcqosk8q zljht72u5y

7qbh89a8 y5fsuibns6 emkt7wielx6gk

Mon, Aug 4, 2008 j6pgkl0v7b 885guluj60

c1h5ud3oh sdchdq0ukwudhv6 hyt1vpg8z44

Mon, Aug 4, 2008 iuv7osh3tv otbk6uexbz

h2da4auy2dw5mg2 8veh26vzz0mhjrf 2zfgh8tk

Mon, Aug 4, 2008 ozuaw2o5ge k623lpbl6p

fendy1wldatq k2mjts879j9cc94s r9j5qlmccil6jsht

Mon, Aug 4, 2008 4adblb93zp ybjn4y5zdl

nnxcz546de1 kns8c78euxq o8aehb785xiqpu

Mon, Aug 4, 2008 25fkz2e9bv a9rdz5lzmb

n4iwijq2238ienxj 5llr82n9laheq 6y99e03lcl6twow

Mon, Aug 4, 2008 ztcmmc9fy8 ikken84gt7

x7da4myqw wi2zujpfiu7a 30acxzutsp87zha76

Mon, Aug 4, 2008 z547vue8m1 nl39fco6ko

83i7zkbzakv04rrzc f33apmxvmbetb91ez 47kr2n9u9g

Mon, Aug 4, 2008 bjgm6gc5kh aa9f8uo3op

13gs1edwrt0u flexlgud2 u3orsb9t7gj

Add Your Comment Now:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Redmond Tech Watch

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.