Microsoft Cites Success of Novell Linux Interop Deal

Microsoft touted its operating system interoperability partnership with Novell on Monday, saying that more than 500 customers have signed up since the program began more than three years ago.

The program does more than just ensure that Windows and Novell SuSE Linux Enterprise play well together in heterogeneous computing environments. It also ensures that users of SuSE Linux Enterprise don't violate Microsoft's patents, providing users with so-called intellectual property (IP) "peace of mind."

When announced in November 2006, the program was denounced furiously by the open source community. A Microsoft official later claimed in May 2007 that Linux violates 235 of Microsoft's patents. However, the company has never been specific about what patents are involved.

Jay Lyman, open source analyst at The 451 Group, said that the interoperability promise is the most important aspect to the Microsoft-Novell deal. Customers he's spoken with have never mentioned IP protection as a compelling reason for buying into the program.

Still, the deal helps Novell in its battle against Red Hat, the current leader in enterprise Linux. By pledging interoperability with Windows, the deal gives organizations another reason to choose SuSE Linux Enterprise over Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Novell even rolled out a program to help organizations make the transition off Red Hat Enterprise Linux, which is known as Novell's "Expanded Support Service."

A study by the Oliver Wyman Group, commissioned by Novell, examines Novell's support model, particularly its Expanded Support Service. The study is available here, but at press time, the PDF file would not download.

Also available at that link (and failing to download) is a Forrester Research study on "The Total Economic Impact of Microsoft and Novell Interoperability Solutions," commissioned by Microsoft and Novell. The study found that the joint OS interop program resulted in "82 percent ROI in under a year with regard to licensing fees, implementation and hardware," according to a Microsoft press release.

In June, Novell announced a partnership with VMware in which VMware will bundle its vSphere cloud-computing platform with Novell's SuSE Linux Enterprise. The announcement that VMware planned to "standardize its virtual appliance-based product offerings on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server" drew swift reaction from Microsoft. In a blog post, Patrick O'Rourke, director of communications for Microsoft's Server and Tools Business, claimed that VMware was offering "a bad deal for customers" by locking them into using vSphere to do patching. In response, VMware said the bundling offer actually streamlines the agreements vSphere customers have to sign.

Lyman dismissed this Microsoft-VMware spat as just part of broader competitive trends.

"I think this is indicative of the increasing competition among the big enterprise virtualization and cloud computing stack providers," Lyman stated via e-mail. "VMware, in particular, is competing more and more with Red Hat and Microsoft, and perhaps Microsoft prefers to count Novell in its camp, but obviously Novell has its own interests."

Lyman also noted that while Microsoft and Red Hat have not signed an IP deal (like Novell), they have nonetheless cooperated. Last year, the two companies announced a collaboration to certify that Windows and Linux will run on each other's virtualization platforms.

VMware and Red Hat increasingly have been stepping on each other's turf, according to analysis by Canonical's Chief Operating Officer Matt Asay, in a CNet blog. Asay points out that Red Hat has been moving into the virtualization space, while VMware bought SpringSource, which competes against Red Hat's JBoss middleware product.

Red Hat has given Novell stiff competition on the enterprise Linux front, but Novell has other worries. The company has been showing up on radar screens as a possible acquisition target. In March, Novell declined a $2 billion takeover bid from Elliott Associates, an investment fund.

About the Author

Kurt Mackie is online news editor for the 1105 Enterprise Computing Group.

comments powered by Disqus

Reader Comments:

Fri, Jan 25, 2013 Melissa florida auto insurance =] universal life insurance =-D cheap car insurance :D DOT =] DOT =-D DOT :D

Mon, May 2, 2011 Larry bladder infection symptoms

Microsoft fails almost at everything what they are doing now.

Sat, Mar 19, 2011 coach

Thank you to our first offer of this article. DOT ,To the merits of the article depends on the degree of social observation, DOT ,or level of understanding of things. View from the contents of this article,the author spent a lot of great thoughts, DOT ,not only from the surface of things,things will be put clearly and simply, DOT ,and from the nature of things seen through the things themselves. DOT ,To the reader a feeling that, DOT clearly understand that readers can see a thorough,clear. DOT ,Also,want to say is look at the article of emotional things appraise itself DOT ,If you hate this thing of,then this article with a criticism of the means, DOT on the contrary,is to praise the color of the. So everyone wants to write articles,then do not carry any emotional description of an object, DOT to appraise the rights to the readers of this,it will be able to arouse the reader's interest. DOT Although the surface appears to be a narrative tone,but it can greatly arouse the reader's sympathy and curiosity.

Tue, Aug 31, 2010 Glibik Australia

Microsoft continues to make patent threats to create fear among Linux users and customers. Close, but should read: "Microsoft continues to make patent threats to create fear uncertainty and doubt (FUD) among all other software users and developers."

Tue, Jun 22, 2010

GreyGeek, 1 customer doesn't mean one coupon. Who do you think they are, Mcdonald's?

Tue, Jun 22, 2010 GreyGeek

After nearly 4 years of efforts all that Microsoft has to show for their efforts is 500 coupons being redeemed? From these and other URLs: and one can glean the fact that Microsoft has "paid" Novell at least $397 Million for coupons (in addition to the $340 gift), at $3,428 each (240M/70000), which calculates out to about 115,000 coupons. Only 500 are redeemed! That works out to 4/10th of 1 percent. Spinning that result into a "success" is like saying that Japan won WWII because they bombed Pearl Harbor, or that BP cares about the environment because they use dispersants to keep the oil from showing on the surface of the Gulf. Coupons == Unix licenses .... It can be concluded from the facts that Novell's survival depends entirely upon cash handouts of Microsoft. One could compare these gifts to Novell with those Microsoft gave to SCO, disguised as purchases of Unix licenses, something SCO didn't own and couldn't legally sell. But hey, what's a few lies among friends? The pseudo licenses helped SCO to pay lawyers to continue Microsoft's attacks on Linux. The coupons help Novell gets allows it to continue its attacks on the GPL and the infestation of Linux desktop with Microsoft's API. (a.k.a. Mono).

Tue, Jun 22, 2010 apexwm

The whole ordeal with software patents is a huge pain. If we didn't have to deal with them, things would be a lot better. Microsoft continues to make patent threats to create fear among Linux users and customers. It's worked so far a few times, but how long will it last?

Mon, Jun 21, 2010 satrac Montreal

500 sign-ups in 3 years does not sound like a successful marketing campaign.

Add Your Comment Now:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Redmond Tech Watch

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.