Barney's Rubble

Super PCs Deserve a Super OS

Software still has a ways to go before it can do justice to today's supercomputers.

For decades Moore's law stood and the density of transistors doubled every two years -- just like Gordon predicted 30 years ago.

But even as we regularly doubled our transistor counts, the chips remained based on a monolithic, single microprocessor model.

Now the hardware geniuses are adding some pretty wild twists. We all know about multi-core processors (an area where AMD has been nicely assertive). By 2015, Intel says it could have processors boasting hundreds of cores.

The graphics chipmakers are doing even wilder work. NVIDIA recently announced a new line of Tesla boards (I'm not sure if these are named after the bad '80s hair band or the inventor of the AC/DC current) that come with as many as 128 parallel processors.

My annoyance is overshadowing my excitement. Software historically has been able to sap the strength of the fastest new chips. But let's face it. Much of this software was bloatware doing things we never asked it to do in the first place.

Now hardware is firmly in the lead. Even the cycle-sucking combo of Windows and Office will have a hard time stressing an AMD quad-core, Tesla-equipped PC.

Unfortunately, my last point is purely theoretical. Right now, Windows is designed mostly to exploit our old style of processing. To truly exploit PC-style supercomputing, brush up on your C programming skills. Many of these systems are built for scientists and engineers who don't mind getting down and dirty with code.

Microsoft can solve this problem, but it involves changing the very way software is written against Windows. First it has to get over its fear of 64-bit and go nuts supporting state-of-the-art processors. And not just Opterons and Athlons and Itaniums (remember that one?), but the Power6 processor, which can now boast the world's fastest microprocessor and drives the fastest server and supercomputer as well.

Microsoft, especially Microsoft Research, is working on these problems. These efforts seem way more aimed at specialized applications, rather than transforming the fundamental way Windows works with back-end hardware.

However, there are companies built to solve this. Google recently bought PeakStream (perhaps to optimize its own server farms). While I don't see Google apps as a threat to Redmond, if it can promote a PeakStream API to developers, our old friend Windows could be very much under siege.

Whether Google or Microsoft take the plunge, either way we may eventually be able to reinvent what PCs are capable of!

What kind of computer power are you jonesin' for? Let us all know by writing dbarney@redmondmag.com.

About the Author

Doug Barney is editor in chief of Redmond magazine and the VP, editorial director of Redmond Media Group.

comments powered by Disqus

Reader Comments:

Wed, Nov 7, 2007 Alexandre Silva Portugal

Good point of view. The computer today's doesn't make more stuff that does in the past 5 years. It time for new stuff.

Add Your Comment Now:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Redmond Tech Watch

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.