News

UPDATED: Vista Desktop Search Fight Gets Uglier

The Microsoft-Google spitting match over desktop search is getting wetter every day, with Google now claiming that Microsoft's remedies don't go far enough, and Microsoft arguing that Google has a bad case of sour grapes.

In a seven-page "friend of the court" brief to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly Monday, Google said that while it "welcomes" the steps to which Microsoft has agreed in order to promote more choice in choosing a desktop search tool, "it appears that more may need to be done to provide a truly unbiased choice of desktop search products in Vista and achieve compliance with the Final Judgment." The Final Judgment is the finding in 2002 that Microsoft was a monopoly and has to submit to federal oversight to ensure competition for its Windows-related products.

Google also argues that Microsoft's proposed solutions to Vista desktop search are too vague. Microsoft agreed to give OEMs and end users the ability to set a new default desktop search product, which is currently Vista "Instant Search." Microsoft also said it would provide links to the default search engine in the Start button and Windows Explorer windows, and instruct third parties how to best integrate other desktop search tools so they work well with Vista.

Google thinks more detail is needed. "Until more is understood about the proposed remedies and how they might affect user choice, it is difficult to assess them fully," it wrote in the brief. "The Court and the public would benefit greatly from a description of the precise measures Microsoft is planning to implement and the practical effect they will have on users of desktop search."

Google also has concerns about the timing of the proposed changes. Microsoft said the new desktop search functionality will be included in Vista SP1, which is expected to be released early next year, after a beta release toward the end of 2007. Google notes that the federal consent decree governing Microsoft's actions is set to expire Nov. 12, and would like to see the decree extended to after the release of SP1 to make sure Microsoft's remedies meet the standards of allowing competition.

Now Microsoft has responded with its own seven-page memo, contending that Google has no standing in the case, and should, in essence, butt out: "Google should not be permitted to create an issue where none exists," Microsoft wrote in the memo, adding that "Google has nothing new to offer the Court, except for the veiled request that this Court go behind the enforcement decision of the plaintiffs and make Google the '20th Plaintiff'."

Google, Microsoft charges, is merely throwing a tantrum because it didn't get what it wanted. "Rather, Google simply disagrees with the conclusion of those designated by the Court to enforce the Final Judgments," Microsoft states.

Microsoft said Google won't play by the legal rules. "Dissatisfied with the Plaintiffs' enforcement of the Final Judgment, Google is seeking to make an 'end-run' around the prohibition on non-parties directly enforcing the decrees," Microsoft said in the memo. In other words, Microsoft and the state and federal governments agreed on the desktop search engine remedy, and that should close the matter.

The initial complaint about Vista's Instant Search was filed by Google last December. Google claimed that Instant Search was anti-competitive because it discouraged the use of other desktop search engines (like Google's Desktop search, which the company claims has been downloaded 640,000 times since its December 2004 release), and that Microsoft essentially rigged Vista to make competing desktop search tools run sluggishly compared to Instant Search.

Microsoft and the various government entities, including the attorneys general of all 50 states, agreed to the remedies on June 19.

About the Author

Keith Ward is the editor in chief of Visual Studio Magazine.

comments powered by Disqus

Reader Comments:

Wed, Jun 27, 2007 jd Indianapolis, IN

First off, I'm not sure a desktop search engine needs to be opened to competitive practices. To me it's part of the OS. Now, if we are talking about searches that also search the web, sure...that should be opened to 3rd party integration. But, just drive searches...the only reason to have another is to say you have it. Like I have Nike shoes because I like them...not because they smell better than Adidas. Basically you like a name brand and want 'Google' all over your OS. I say just wait for your Google OS and don't use Vista or any MS OS. Too many hipocrits in the world today always wanting to complain about something. As my daycare teachers tell my kids..."you take what you get and you don't throw a fit."

Tue, Jun 26, 2007 fg Virginia

Sounds more like Google trying to justify it over priced stock. Wait and see Google is worse than MS who sells your data for a buck! Now lets talk about shareholders interest.

Tue, Jun 26, 2007 df colo

More power to Google. Microsoft's continuing abuse of its monopoly product, Windows, by adding "innovations" (self serving anti competitively designed features) intended to hurt companies that compete against it needs to be stopped. The predatory monopoly business model used by MS requires government action to help attempt to level the playing field so that MS can't always win (or gain an advantage) simply by adding an "innovation" to the OS. All computer users who value evolution in the computer industry should strongly support governmental action against MS until they either lose their monopoly or change their business model to one of competing on the merits of their products.
We should all work toward the direction of better computing, and this will require action against the one company with the power to stop good and powerful innovations that do not happen to be in the interest of the shareholders of MS stock.

Add Your Comment Now:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Redmond Tech Watch

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.