News

Spamhaus Project To Appeal $12M Judgment

An anti-spam group plans to appeal a federal court ruling that could jeopardize its domain name after ignoring a lawsuit earlier on jurisdictional grounds.

An attorney for the Spamhaus Project, Matthew Neumeier, said Wednesday that the group will challenge an $11.7 million judgment against it as well as a court order U.S. District Court Judge Charles P. Kocoras is expected to sign ordering the spamhaus.org domain suspended.

e360 Insight sued Spamhaus, arguing it had improperly placed the company on a "blacklist" of spammers. Service providers and others use Spamhaus' list to help identify which messages to block, send to a "junk" folder or accept.

Bart Loethen, an attorney for e360 Insight, said his client is a direct marketer that does not send unsolicited e-mail. But the U.K.-based Spamhaus refused to recognize the U.S. District Court's jurisdiction, did not bother to defend itself in the case and had no plans to comply with the monetary judgment. The company responded by asking the court to suspend the domain name.

Spamhaus claims that more than 650 million Internet users benefit from its list of spammers. Losing the domain name would make it more difficult for service providers and others to obtain the list, the group contends.

It is not clear Kocoras could easily order such a suspension because the Domain Name System is in the hands of organizations and companies that are not parties to the lawsuit. Already, the Internet's key oversight agency, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, issued a statement saying it does not have the ability or authority to suspend individual domain names.

comments powered by Disqus

Reader Comments:

Wed, Oct 25, 2006 Timothy Raleigh, NC

I'm very disappointed in the judge who thinks (1) he has jurisdiction and (2) he can submit orders to suspend ANYTHING on the internet where the governing body is international in scope. If the company was in the USA, okay. But it's not! This judge is acting unethically and needs to be removed from the bench. I hope the appeals court ends this silliness by overturning the ruling.

Fri, Oct 20, 2006 Dr. John Anonymous

These clowns claiming they don't spam, in a court of law, no less, is akin to water claiming it isn't wet.

Add Your Comment Now:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Redmond Tech Watch

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.