News

Windows 2003 Exams Added to MCDBA Roster

New Windows 2003 exams can be used to fulfill core networking requirements of the MCDBA on SQL 2000 track.

Microsoft announced on its Web site that the new Windows 2003 exams currently under development can be used to fulfill the core networking requirements of the MCDBA on SQL Server 2000 credential.

Specifically, 70-290: Managing and Maintaining a Windows Server 2003 Environment and 70-291: Implementing, Managing, and Maintaining a Windows Server 2003 Network Infrastructure, make up two of the three choices available for that segment of the track. Exam 70-215: Windows 2000 Server is the other option and has been available since June 2000. Both 70-290 and 70-291 are expected to be available in August.

According to a Microsoft FAQ, the company is making the change "to provide MCDBA candidates with the opportunity to fulfill core and elective requirements while demonstrating their Windows Server 2003 expertise." The FAQ also notes that candidates who decide to take 70-290 and 7-291 for the track will no longer be able to count 70-028: and 70-019: Designing and Implementing Data Warehouses with SQL Server 7.0 towards fulfilling the MCDBA on SQL 2000 requirements. The company explains on the FAQ that it's "introducing new exam requirements to allow candidates to fulfill MCDBA requirements based on compatible technologies." By this, the company seems to acknowledge that such a unique technical incompatibility exists between SQL Server 7.0 and Windows 2003 that distinctive paths have to be carved within the MCDBA. [Microsoft has been asked for clarification and comment, but it couldn't provide them as of this posting.]

Microsoft has also added another exam, 70-293: Planning and Maintaining a Windows Server 2003 Network Infrastructure, to the MCDBA roster; the exam is now an elective option. Exam 70-293 is also under development (the exam's beta testing period ends June 29).

To view the exam objective guides:

To see the MCDBA requirements, click here. To read Microsoft's FAQ on the changes, click here.

About the Author

Michael Domingo is Editor in Chief of Virtualization Review. He's been an IT writer and editor for so long that he remember typing out news items in WordStar.

comments powered by Disqus

Reader Comments:

Sat, Mar 19, 2011 zvciovemdtj wpp90u vtcxmulltpoo, [url=http://xvrqkxdyddgs.com/]xvrqkxdyddgs[/url], [link=http://iuoegxklducw.com/]iuoegxklducw[/link], http://dbnpyydramhc.com/

wpp90u http://vtcxmulltpoo.com/ DOT , [url=http://xvrqkxdyddgs.com/]xvrqkxdyddgs[/url], [link=http://iuoegxklducw.com/]iuoegxklducw[/link], http://dbnpyydramhc.com/

Wed, Jul 16, 2003 Anonymous Anonymous

I agree with you Jeff, and honestly, congrats on beating out that many applicants-- that's no small feat

Thu, Jul 10, 2003 Jeff Phoenix

I don't think paper certs stand a chance of getting a job anymore, maybe a few years back but not anymore. I earned my MCSE along with 6 years of experience managing systems. I just got a new job where there were 1300 applicants. Was this any kind of special job? Nope, just a general network admin job. However there are so many IT workers out of work right now that there are guys who used to make 120K year that are willing to work for less than half that now. In fact my employer seemed especially keen to ensure that I wasn't a "paper cert" and actually had me sit down on a system and "prove my stuff" before they were willing to let me have a second interview.

Mon, Jun 30, 2003 Edy Callison San Bernardino, CA

why is every one screems paper cert, as a IT Director we know if the experience is only paper, a person that gains the experience and seeks the cert shows fortitud, the person with only a paper cert will come and go, this is a small industry and the word gets around who has it and who caint cut the musturd.

Sun, Jun 29, 2003 MJ TX

Maybe it is time to give corporate america what they have been asking for. They obviously don't want experienced IT persons, let them hire the paper certs and get what they want to pay for then contract out at a higher price to clean up the mess. Might as well go ahead and get paid for not working because once the mess is cleaned up you'll be spending more money on all new certs.

Add Your Comment Now:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Redmond Tech Watch

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.